|
March 2008 Archives March 31, 2008Blog PicksWomen in Planetary Science Blog "Planetary science, roughly, is the study of the planets, moons, comets, asteroids, atmospheres, and dust -- everything in the solar system besides the Earth and Sun. Women make up half the bodies in the solar system. Why not half the scientists?"
Posted by kcowing at 11:50 PM | Permalink
OIG on FY 07 Audit"E&Y separately reported in its "Report on Internal Control," dated November 13, 2007, certain matters involving internal control and its operation that it considered to be significant deficiencies and material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. E&Y also followed up on matters involving internal control (Enclosure) that were reported in the "Comments on Internal Control and Other Matters" letter issued February 1, 2007, as part of the fiscal year (FY) 2006 audit."
Posted by kcowing at 9:24 PM | Permalink
NASA OIG on NAOMS: "Missed Opportunity"
"The Government may have missed an opportunity to foster a deeper understanding of the aviation safety environment from 2001 through 2004 because its working groups were unable to reach a consensus on the validity or value of the NAOMS data. As a result, NASA was reluctant to publish a report detailing research and conclusions garnered from the collected NAOMS survey data."
Posted by kcowing at 9:19 PM | Permalink
I Know What Sessions Will Be Heavily Attended ...
"Actress Jolene Blalock, known for her role as Commander T'Pol on Star Trek: Enterprise, has also committed to serve as special guest award presenter for the Space Technology Hall of Fame Private Induction Ceremony and special guest master of ceremonies for the Space Technology Hall of Fame Dinner, on Thursday, April 10."
Posted by kcowing at 8:54 PM | Permalink
ESMD's Revolving Door - Update
"Horowitz, now an independent aerospace consultant whose clients include ATK, the Ares I first-stage contractor, and a "greybeard" advisor to NASA through the NASA Engineering and Safety Center, served on the tiger team that reviewed the thrust oscillation issue after it arose last fall. Garry M. Lyles, the senior NASA engineer who headed that review panel, is scheduled to brief Congress on his findings the week of March 31." Earlier posts ESMD's Revolving Door - Update
Posted by kcowing at 3:19 PM | Permalink
March 30, 2008Everest OnOrbit Update
Scott Parazynski's Location: 31 March - 2 April 2008 (map) "Scott Parazynski and his team left Namche Bazar on 31 March and headed to Tengboche. His team will spend a full day acclimatizing in Tengboche, and then depart on 2 April for Dingboche. The map below shows their general location." Scott Parazynski Everest Update 28 March 2008, OnOrbit.com "This morning I arose at 0530 to climb up to a high point above the village, where I saw Everest for the first time --- the sun rising dramatically from behind it. Huge swirling clouds over it and Lhotse, the fourth highest mountain in the world, showed the power of the jet stream at those altitudes."
Posted by kcowing at 11:24 AM | Permalink
March 29, 2008JSC's Moon TruckNot a Mercury or Saturn, but It Goes Way Off Road, NY Times "It turns on a dime and parallel-parks like a dream. On the downside, it’s a little pricey (at $2 million or so) and its top speed is a pokey 15 miles an hour. Still, there’s a lot to like about the concept car taking shape here at the Johnson Space Center. Did I say car? The new moon buggy conceived by space center engineers is anything but a car or a buggy. Its official name is Chariot, and this, my friends, is a truck. A heavy duty workhorse of a truck."
Posted by kcowing at 8:36 PM | Permalink
NOMAD: A Step Forward - or Backward?
Some effects have been to have messages sent from the NASA Administrator classified as spam. It has also caused very large volumes of email (hundreds of thousands of non-spam messages) from non-NOMAD servers be delayed for hours on many separate occasions. Recently, GSFC center director Ed Weiler sent a broadcast message to ALL GSFC employees about a sudden all-hands meeting concerning his move back to NASA HQ. This message was received after the event by most NOMAD integrated staff, while those few not yet migrated into the new system received the email within seconds. Only those staff who were telephoned about the meeting were able to attend. In effect, this has caused huge numbers of NASA employees and contractors to use gmail or some outside email service as their reliable form of communication. In addition what used to be relatively free is now costs about $25/month/user to fund only 200 Mb of email storage space. A huge step down not counting the reliability issues." NOMAD - NASA Operational Messaging and Directory Service Comments? Send them to nasawatch@spaceref.com Your comments thus far: I was transitioned to NOMAD last week (and missed Weiler's all-hands because of it). I am not usually a complainer, but this is certainly worse than our previous solution not even considering that we must pay much more for this. Our office had our own mail server, so most of the emails we sent around were within the office, and those used to be instantaneous even with big attachments. Now, nomad is hit and miss, and large attachments are not possible. Two hour lags in email delivery is not uncommon. The web interface seems old, and is slow (I'll only use that if I have to). I've been with NASA ten years, never had a meeting maker account, so I don't know what I'm missing there. This is a concern to me. When migrating, I was given a temp password, based on a formula including my initials. I went to change the password, and it was denied with an error saying what I chose was not complex enough. I kept increasing complexity until it was nearly random, including upper and lower case with numbers and symbols. This was starting to take an hour, so I called the help desk. I was informed then (not when I was given the temp password, and not in the password change errors) that the policy was to not allow a password change for 5 days. So, for 5 days, anyone who might know when I was migrating, and the formula, could easily gain access to my NOMAD account. My understanding is that a big motivation for NOMAD was security. I can't help but think that there are many free email services out there with more space, faster, better designed and better security. Is one-size fits all a NASA thing or a Govt thing? I can remember as far back as the first browsers that were available on the MacIntosh that had email (early 90's) that we never had any problems communicating. In fact when MSFC was almost an all Mac shop we could access printers and other equipment out on the center through an Apple talk domain from UAH. All we had to do was print to a print spooler at MSFC our power point presentations and they would print, be collated, and ready to hand out by the time we got there from the short drive over. We never had any problems with email or messages between centers either and could even use CUSEEME to video conference to different centers or across the globe to the Moscow Aviation Institute. Everything went straight to hell in a handbasket when the center made the forced switch over to an all PC environment and has never recovered. I recommend a special section in Economist about a month ago on egovernment around the world. The number one lesson is that when governments insist on developing their own software they end up with obsolete, unfriendly systems that are more expensive to maintain than commercial systems. NOMAD seems to be just one more example. The take-away message: any communications system that begins with N (for NASA) is going to be inferior to what our kids and grandkids are using every day. Hi Keith- Here are a few comments on NOMAD from both an IT standpoint (not an official NASA opinion) and as an end user. One correction from an earlier comment. NOMAD is a collection of commercially available products, namely Microsoft Exchange coupled with mobile add ons (Blackberry Enterprise Server and Goodlink for Treos) and the usual Microsoft clients (Outlook/Entourage). It is NOT a custom implementation as one commenter said. While I am no lover of Microsoft Exchange (more on that below), I think ON THE WHOLE it has been a huge improvement for the agency. We have excellent synchronization with mobile devices (at least as good as it gets, not NASA's fault), we have common scheduling capability and the access to exchange is not limited to a certain center's (or the nasa.gov) network. I can access Exchange from my home machine as well with my NASA laptop from any network. These are all benefits from an end user standpoint that were NOT available with center-based services. I think many of the people complaining are just complainers at heart with very revisionist memories. Remember all of those "wonderful" center-based e-mail services? They all worked differently, were not all easily accessible and there was no calendaring integration. You'd go to center X for example and have to VPN home just to get your mail! Or you could get to the pop server to receive mail, but you couldn't send mail because the smtp server was behind the center firewall. When we all used center-based Meeting Maker calendaring software, everyone HATED this thing You couldn't schedule with people out of your center etc and it was not at all integrated with anything else. All of this used to drive the same complainers crazy, that NASA was not "with it". Well, we got "with it" and they still complain. Like it or not MS Exchange is pretty much the gold standard for this kind of COTS messaging. We can debate whether other tools like Lotus Notes (we piloted these a number of years ago) and Zimbra etc, are better (the process for selecting Exchange was less than ideal). That said, they all have their issues and I believe MS Exchange provided the best solution. It's a pick your poison kind of decision. My main beef with Exchange is that it is a closed product and to be able to integrate 3rd party software (iPhones, open source clients et al), you have to pay exorbitant licensing fees to Microsoft for use of their APIs. There is good news on this front thanks to the EU suit, they are now publishing many APIs (including Exchange 2007) and allowing non commercial royalty free use. So technically, Mozilla could now build in Exchange support to Thunderbird, which would get us out of the Microsoft client "jail". Read this: Entourage is a bastard stepchild to Outlook and Linux/Unix users are left in the dust. That is my main rant about Exchange is it's lack of openness. But hopefully that will change. From an IT management perspective, I'm sure the numbers for consolidation work in the agency's favor, that's what business case analysis required by OMB is for (Enterprise Architecture). It gets rid of the feefdoms that are so often built. So my comment to the complainers: GET OVER IT, you have it better! On another note about IM, FINALLY, there is a move afoot to open up the NASA Jabber service to be accessed outside of NASA, once the appropriate authentication infrastructure is ready. This will be a great boost to making that service REALLY useful and we won't have to use things like Yahoo or GoogleTalk when we are outside the nasa.gov network. You mentioned the $25 cost/user/month. At Goddard not only does this apply to people it also applies to conference rooms if you want to schedule them through the Nomad Calender. I read your latest posting on NOMAD with great interest, I, for one, saw it as a welcomed change to NASA. It integrated all of the Centers (or is in the midst of doing so) with a common messaging system and allows us to access our email off site with much greater ease. As for the 'huge' numbers of employees using another form of email service I am skeptical of that, unless you have been bombarded with thousands of emails from NASA employees. I have had very little trouble with the new system. As for the spam problem, I think that is in issue wherever we go. I know I always have that with my home email account. Thank you for the post about NOMAD. I've been wondering when something about it would show up on NASA Watch. Before NOMAD, when my Center ran its own mail servers, we had extremely speedy and reliable e-mail, with excellent spam filters. NOMAD's speed of e-mail transfer varies widely. Occasionally e-mail goes through quickly (although rarely as quickly as it once did), but often there are delays of multiple hours between the time a message is sent and the time it is received, even when sender and recipient are in the same building. Perhaps this is intentional; after all, one of the definitions of 'nomad' is 'a wanderer', and e-mail does seem to wander about at times. The NOMAD spam filtering is inconsistent, often letting messages through that are obviously spam, and blocking other messages that are obviously not spam (even when the sender is 'whitelisted'). So, the bottom line is, as most of us expected in advance it would be, our e-mail service quality has definitely suffered since the forced transition to NOMAD. A researcher at Langley (not using NOMAD to send this message, to be sure it gets to you today.) Hi, This is Goddard management's response to the recent NOMAD problems. I had to read this a few times before I realized that it was not intended to be satire. Is [DELETED] really proposing that NASA business be conducted over Facebook?
From: [DELETED] Ok, everyone was complaining about the email latency in NOMAD today. I think it all started this morning when the shock wave hit about Alan Stern leaving NASA. Everyone decided to email all their colleagues and friends with the news, and that choked up the system. well, that's a better excuse than the real reason (believe me you dont want to know... ). Personally, I missed most of Weiler's all-hands meeting, because I didnt get the email in time. Do you ever get the feeling that email is just ancient technology? well, it is! Just ask anyone under the age of 21. My daughter (21) still uses IM, cell phone, facebook. My son (19) does everything on an iphone (he did his physics homework on it this week, and sent it to his professor from his iphone). There was an article in the Washington Post last week about things that have become obsolete in our lifetime... here is a quote from the story: "I used to use Instant Messenger, but now I mostly use Facebook to communicate with people. I use e-mail for, like, reaching my coaches or uncles -- older people. Otherwise it's either my cellphone or Facebook." -- Emily Siegel, 16, Alexandria So, there you have it... NASA's problem is that we are all "old people". Maybe we deserve tardy email. Certainly true, especially the incident described below. I received my email time-tagged at 3:33PM when the meeting was at 11:30AM and the email was sent at 10:38AM. I like the post about NOMAD. In general I've felt the IT capabilities and systems we use at NASA are laughable. The new FDCC requirements are about to handcuff the researchers into access to limited "approved" software. This will turn our ODIN issued computers into little more than e-mail machines, and many of us researchers and engineers don't have alternatives. It seems that there is an idea that we can do our jobs with Word and Powerpoint alone. I would encourage you to cover the IT debacle that NASA is putting itself through. And the toll its having on engineers just trying to get there work done. BTW, access to external email is blocked at some centers, including gmail. I'm not sure of the policy at other centers, but at JSC we are restricted from accessing external mail services from our on-site computers. Services like gmail and yahoo mail are blocked by IT. I've been having email delivery issues myself - not all off-site contractor emails are getting to me. Who knows what important data I could be missing.
Posted by kcowing at 10:12 AM | Permalink
March 28, 2008Today's Video: XCOR Lynx Flight Profile"The LYNX suborbital vehicle now under development at XCOR Aerospace."
Posted by kcowing at 7:34 PM | Permalink
Living on Earth - Living on MarsSix High-Tech Earth Cities That Will Provide Blueprints for Martian Settlers, io9.com "If humans land on Mars by 2037 as NASA hopes, they'll need cities modeled on ones that already exist in extreme climates on Earth. Here are six high-tech (and a few low-tech) cities that would have a passing shot at survival in the Martian climate. Of course there are the obvious choices, like research stations in Antarctica. But there are other possibilities, like the instant city model developed at Black Rock City, home to arts festival Burning Man, which you can see here nestled in a Martian crater. And there are others potential Martian city models that might surprise you, like ones in Nunavut, Canada and in ancient Native American pueblos."
Posted by kcowing at 6:59 PM | Permalink
SMD UpdateNASA Weathers Departure, Rumors of Budget Cuts, NPR "Audio for this story will be available at approx. 6:00 p.m. ET Talk of the Nation, March 28, 2008 - Planetary scientist Alan Stern has announced that he is stepping down as NASA's associate administrator for the Science Mission Directorate, the head role in the space agency's science programs. His departure was unexpected, and the agency gave no reason for the sudden departure."
Posted by kcowing at 5:06 PM | Permalink
Jim Hansen in The News AgainPM urged to veto new coal-fired generators, The Age "Dr Hansen's letter, written as a private citizen rather than in his capacity as NASA's top climate scientist and Adjunct Professor at the Columbia University Earth Institute, is similar to the one he sent British Prime Minister Gordon Brown this year. In 2006 he accused the Bush Administration of trying to gag calls for urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and has urged colleagues to speak up in communicating their observations of the changing planet."
Posted by kcowing at 2:31 PM | Permalink
SMD Chief Scientist Leaving NASA HQ
Posted by kcowing at 12:20 AM | Permalink
March 27, 2008Interesting Interior Quicktime VR of Space ShuttleSpace Shuttle Interior, Panoscan "These images were captured last in September 2001 for training purposes. The images were captured inside the high fidelity training mock up at the Johnson Space Center in Houston Texas. This mock up features the later "glass" cockpit design that was used in the Columbia. To view these images you will need QuickTime 7."
Posted by kcowing at 10:54 PM | Permalink
Webcast With Richard Garriott
"On April 21, 2008 at 12:00pm ET, Richard Garriott will hold an interactive live webcast with students and teachers. Students of all ages are encouraged to submit a question for Mr. Garriott on the Challenger Center for Space Science Education's website: http://www.challenger.org. Questions can be submitted in writing or by video. If a question is chosen for the webcast, Mr. Garriott will answer it during the live webcast. Student videos may also be used on the live webcast and posted on the Challenger Center YouTube site. Deadline is April 18th for submissions. All Challenger Center webcasts are free and open to the general public and archived for viewing post event."
Posted by kcowing at 8:25 PM | Permalink
Tracking Jules Verne
Posted by kcowing at 7:04 PM | Permalink
Mapping TitanA Vector Map of the Unnamed Methane Sea on Titan, io9.com "Peter Minton is a California teacher who loves to make vector maps in his spare time. His favorite places to map are islands and coastlines, and so when the Cassini-Huygens probe sent back images from Saturn's moon Titan he was happy to discover the geographical features he loves most. There, on the pole of Titan, was a sea full of islands. An unnamed methane sea, but still mappable using vectoring software. This is the map he created, with longitude and latitude lines."
Posted by kcowing at 5:40 PM | Permalink
IARPAWatch: Lisa Porter Re-emergesIntroducing Iarpa! It's Like Darpa, But for Spies, Wired "Picture Q as a tall blond woman with an American accent, and you've got Porter. Lisa Porter. She's the first head of America's new Q branch, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity -- Iarpa for short -- a fledgling office charged with outfitting US spooks with the highest-tech information-gathering gadgetry."
Posted by kcowing at 5:36 PM | Permalink
Falcon 9 Engine Firing VIdeo - Note: Play This One Loud
"Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) conducted the first three-engine firing of its Falcon 9 medium to heavy lift rocket at its Texas Test Facility outside McGregor, on March 8, 2008. At full power the engines generated over 270,000 pounds of force, and consumed 1,050 lbs of fuel and liquid oxygen per second. This three-engine test again sets the record as the most powerful test yet on the towering 235-foot tall test stand. A total of nine Merlin 1C engines will power the Falcon 9 rocket."
Posted by kcowing at 4:15 PM | Permalink
Budget UpdateAIP FYI #41: Bad News/Good News: Congress Takes First Steps in FY 2009 Appropriations Cycle "... the general sentiment in Washington is that the probability of concluding the FY 2009 budget cycle by its start on October 1 is very slim. There is a widespread consensus that Congress and President Bush will find it necessary to use a series of stopgap funding bills to maintain program spending in the new fiscal year at this year's levels. This is expected to have grave ramifications for the programs of most federal agencies, which will grow worse as the standoff continues into what is expected to be early 2009."
Posted by kcowing at 3:28 PM | Permalink
Everest OnOrbit Update
"We depart for the KTM airport at 0500 local tomorrow to fly to Lukla, when the trek really begins. We met up as a full IMG team for the first time late this afternoon, and I just returned from our welcome dinner at a nearby rooftop garden restaurant." Astronaut to Climb Everest for his Vacation, Wired "Five time Space Shuttle Astronaut Scott Parazynski, 46, will be fulfilling a life long dream of climbing Mt. Everest "on his own time and on his own dime" this May. True to form, Parazynski's packing list would make any Shuttle commander proud, down to the weight in grams of everything he is taking with him." Rocket Scientist Training, NASA Everest Trek "Here's a training routine you can use if you want to be a rocket scientist" "The following is a timeline for Scott Parazynski, Keith Cowing, and the NASA Everest Team treks to Everest Base Camp. This schedule is tentative and subject to revision." More updates at Everest OnOrbit, OnOrbit.com
Posted by kcowing at 12:28 PM | Permalink
March 26, 2008Endeavour Is Home
"With Commander Dominic Gorie and Pilot Gregory H. Johnson at the controls, space shuttle Endeavour glided to a picture perfect landing at Kennedy Space Center, Fla. The STS-123 crew began its mission March 11 and arrived at the International Space Station March 12. The astronauts delivered the Japanese Logistics Module - Pressurized Section (JLP), the first pressurized component of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's Kibo laboratory to the station. The crew of Endeavour also delivered the final element of the station's Mobile Servicing System, the Canadian-built Dextre, also known as the Special Purpose Dextrous Manipulator."
Posted by kcowing at 8:48 PM | Permalink
Alan Stern Is Leaving NASANASA Administrator Announces Science Mission Directorate Leadeship Changes "NASA Administrator Michael D. Griffin issued the following statement Wednesday regarding the announcement that Dr. S. Alan Stern, NASA associate administrator for the Science Mission Directorate, has decided to leave the agency."
Comments? Send them to nasawatch@spaceref.com. Your responses thus far: While I have not agreed with all his decisions, I think that Alan Stern's tenure at SMD has been a huge boost to space science and his resignation is truly unfortunate. Also unfortunate, however, is the amount of misinformation being spread (often with the best intentions) by people without a full grasp of the facts. For example, "Anonymous manager" used MER operations as an example of "overzealous spending", pointing out "a 75% reduction in productivity for a 20% budget cut" on a project with "300 individuals driving two rovers". The facts are the following: The proposed budget cut, that was to be applied to the remaining funds in FY08, was roughly 40%. One rover was to be cut back from the current standard 80% duty cycle (due to the way Mars time aligns with a standard work shift) to 60% (this does not include the fact that the rovers are not commanded on weekends), a 25% reduction. In addition, the second rover that was to be hibernated (not killed) still required weekly contacts and some minimum amount of engineering analysis and commanding to maintain its viability in the dynamic martian environment; let's say this is an 75% reduction. This still comes out to ~50% overall, more than a proportional 40%, but unfortunately project expenditures are never linear. As for the 300 people driving the rovers, total MER staffing (management, operations, IT support, data processing, etc.) at JPL is roughly 50 FTEs; the larger number quoted accounts for part-time individuals and the large science team, many of whom receive minimal funding. It is fair to question the scientific usefulness and management efficiency of any mission, particularly those in their extended phases. MER undergoes detailed external (non-JPL) science and management reviews at least annually investigating these issues, and so far they have concluded that it represents an excellent science value for the expenditure and that the operations budget is lean and reasonable. Your opinion may vary. There are many troubling issues with costs and overruns withing SMD, and many places (certainly including JPL!) where blame can be assigned. But while I welcome a spirited (no pun intended) discussion, I think we should try to avoid opinions masquerading as facts. Anonymous MER staffer The recent resignation of SMD head Alan Stern is indeed very unfortunate as Alan was leading the charge for physical responsibility within NASA Space Sciences and hence getting the American tax payer best science for the dollar. Hopefully this will lead to a much needed public debate over the subject. One very recent example of overzealous spending are the JPL MER operations. NASA requested of JPL a $4M reduction in spending for an already long extended mission. JPL's response was to threaten shutting down one rover and operating the other at 50% duty cycle. Thats a 75% reduction in productivity for 20% budget cut ! This hardly seems like a proportionate response, but instead an emotional over reaction that will ultimately prove more destructive that helpful to JPL's objectives. No one is more impressed with the accomplishments of the MER mission than I. It is a glowing exampling of what "out of the box" solutions JPL can produce. But lets get real, these rovers have been in operation for 3 years. They should no longer require a marching army to operate. Empire builders at JPL are clearly using public support for MER to defend over solving the problem keeping 300 individuals driving two rovers. Other examples of throwing people, not creative solutions, at the problem exist at JPL including MSL development and CASSINI operations. JPL has many talented and creative individuals trying to do an honest days work, if not herculean. But their reputation is being tarnished by JPL empire builders who's only goal is to turn highly ambitious projects into public works programs. Alan tried but failed to get this situation under control. But he could not do it without the support of Charles Elachi (JPL director). Only he can and should put an end to wasteful spending in his institution. Only he can send set the needed tone at JPL. But he has failed to do so. Now JPL will have a new pit bull to deal with. Their old "friend" Ed Weiler from GSFC. Anonymous manager of a NASA science mission
SPECIAL: FROM JAMES GREEN, DIRECTOR PLANETARY SCIENCE DIVISION - CHANGES AT NASA HEADQUARTERS If you have not heard, Alan Stern has resigned at NASA Headquarters. As Associate Administrator for the Science Mission Directorate, Alan was a tremendous driving force for positive change. He made many really tough decisions with a full commitment and stood by his people at all times. What an absolutely historic year this has been. I can only tell you that I thoroughly enjoyed working with Alan and that it has been the highlight in my very long NASA career. Alan is just outstanding in every way. I feel I have lost my best boss and gained a great friend at the same time. Although he won't be down the hall he will return to our planetary science community. Dr. Ed Weiler director of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, has been named as interim Associate Administrator. I have known Dr. Weiler for many years and I am delighted that he will be coming back to Headquarters. From my perspective, the Planetary Science Division continues to have a very bright and stable future with tremendously exciting science missions in all stages of development and operation. We have an outstanding staff of people who are committed to the path we are on and are ready to face each and every challenge ahead and that has not changed. Alan Stern tried to do more to introduce and implement fiscal responsibility and accountability than anyone else in the history of NASA. Of course there was pain, but Alan was even-handed in "spreading the pain" across programs and projects. In addition, Alan could see right through unnecessary costs, including the self-serving, artificially inflated costs of the poorly managed MSL program. Alan was not afraid to question assumptions and "traditions" that were never questioned before. Alan was impatient with poor management than sacrificed science. By simply serving the interests of good science at reasonable costs he was a threat to some of the stodgy interests and assumptions of the past. His cost- and science-conscious philosophy was rippling through the Agency and its contractors, introducing accountability and responsibility that had always been subordinated to financial and power interests. Before he became the AA for SMD, Alan was one of the smartest and most engaged PI's I ever encountered. He knew everything about his missions. He carried that kind of dedication into his NASA job and noone ever doubted that his primary interest was conducting great science at the greatest "bang for the buck" for the taxpayers. As to whether this will put an end to "Griffin's credibility to manage" NASA, let's put this in perspective. Two days ago the 4,000th U.S. soldier died in Iraq, the economy is in deep enough trouble that the Federal Reserve has had to step in with a $29 Billion mortgage loan guarantee, and just a couple of months ago Congress could not come up with a measly $1 Billion extra for NASA, an amount that is chewed up in...what? two days in Iraq and Afghanistan, so does anyone here really believe this management change will even register with Congress or the White House? But Alan Stern answers the question of Griffin's management abilities in his email, which you posted a copy of on NASA Watch, when he writes, "[Mike Griffin] remains in my eyes the best Administrator NASA has ever had." Who are we to disagree with Alan Stern? I wish Congress would do its job and fund NASA in a manner commiserate with its many missions. I also wish pork-barrel spending was eliminated. Call me a dreamer. I find the first and last Stern items on the current page to be very intriguing when juxtaposed. Taken together, they seem to say that there may be no one who could "credibly manage" NASA in the current environment.
Posted by kcowing at 10:45 AM | Permalink
XCOR Introduces The Lynx
"The Air Vehicles Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) has awarded, pending successful contract negotiations and signature by the Government Contracting Officer, XCOR Aerospace a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II contract to develop and test operationally responsive features of one of the firm's commercial vehicles. The suborbital space vehicle, named the Lynx, is designed to carry a pilot and a person or payload on suborbital flights."
Posted by kcowing at 9:57 AM | Permalink
NASA's Latest Budget ProblemsMajor NASA projects over budget, USA Today "Two-thirds of NASA's major new programs are significantly over budget or behind schedule, according to the agency's latest report to Congress. NASA's nearly stagnant budget requires the agency to cut projects to make up for unexpected expenses, and cost overruns nearly shut down one of the rovers on Mars -- until it got a reprieve Tuesday. They also threaten completion of a climate-change satellite called Glory." Mars Rovers Survive NASA's Budget Crunch, Washington post "Closing down either of the rovers is not on the table," Brown quoted Griffin as saying Monday night. Then yesterday NASA released a statement that said: "This letter was not coordinated with the administrator's office and is in the process of being rescinded. The administrator has unequivocally stated that no rover will be turned off." NASA holds off on budget cuts to Mars rover program, LA Times "Griffin's statement blamed the cost overruns "in large part" on an underestimate of the design problems connected with building a rover as complex as the MSL, which has cooking ovens and a laser that can zap rocks from a distance. Other factors include a need for a larger than expected workforce at JPL, as well as the cost of redesigning the heat shield for the rover after the original shield failed in tests."
Posted by kcowing at 8:58 AM | Permalink
March 25, 2008NASA Spares Spunky Rovers From Heartless Budgeteers' AxeNASA: Mars Rovers Won't Be Cut, AP "NASA says it has absolutely no plan to turn off either of the Mars Rovers because of budget cuts. NASA is saying Tuesday that it has rescinded a letter that recommended budget cuts in the Mars Rover program to cover the cost of a next-generation rover on the Red Planet."
Posted by kcowing at 3:04 PM | Permalink
Give Us What We Want or We'll Shoot The Cute Little Rover
"Scientists plan to put one of the twin Mars rovers to sleep and limit the activities of the other robot to fulfill a NASA order to cut $4 million from the program's budget, mission team members said Monday." Mixed signals from NASA about fate of Mars rover, CNN "There is a process that has to be followed for any mission to be canceled and the cancellation of the Mars Exploration Rovers is not under consideration," Jacobs said. "There is an ongoing budget review within the agency's Mars exploration program. However, shutting down of one of the rovers is not an option."
Meanwhile, yet another outrageous cost overrun on MSL due to JPL's bad management has forced NASA to cough up $200 million in an attempt to fix things. If keeping a hobbled rover, as spunky and adorable as it is, alive is that important you'd think that JPL could find a way to work that $4 million out of the $200 million they have all but extorted from NASA HQ. Moreover, given that they screwed up, you'd think they'd dip into the fee (i.e. their profit) that they get from their contract to NASA. But no, JPL only knows how to stick their hand out - and not into their own pocket. That said, the rovers are still an astonishing investment that can be capitalized on for mere peanuts - its just a shame that JPL has let the situation stoop to this new low and allows the rovers to be held hostage. Some folks mumble behind the scenes that HQ forced JPL into the situation it now finds itself in. All I can offer is to ask what this says about JPL's ability to understand the real cost of its programs. Moreover, it speaks volumes as to the lengths JPL will go to get missions including looking the other way when they know that the numbers don't add up. Stay tuned. I am certain that Lou Friedman and the Planetary Society will soon sound off on Pasadena-centric Mars politics once again. Comments? Send them to nasawatch@spaceref.com. Your comments thus far: Hi Keith, I have to disagree, you are wrong about your assessment of Spirit. "Even if it was fully active its ability to do meaningful science is all but at an end...". There is still plenty of meaningful science left in Spirit and for Spirit to do! We are currently parked on Home Plate for the winter season, by the way we did this same type of thing last martian winter. In this stationary mode we are/were still able to conduct useful and meaningful geologic and atmospheric investigations. As for your comment if it was 'fully active' if by that you mean that if we were driving Spirit then you are wrong yet again on this. We have many exciting and important targets awaiting us to the south of Home Plate (von Braun, Goddard, The Promised Land, search for more silica rich deposits) and I could go on. The geologic story here in the Inner Basin of the Columbia Hills is a very rich and complex one indeed, with a plethora of more meaningful scientific discoveries awaiting to be made! In fact, Spirit's capabilities now -- except for the power situation, which varies with the seasons and will improve once spring comes -- are essentially identical to what they were 300 sols ago. And it was 300 sols ago that Spirit made the most important discovery of its mission to date... the very silica-rich deposits adjacent to Home Plate that point toward ancient hydrothermal activity in Gusev crater. So this rover is still very capable of doing science that is not just meaningful, but ground-breaking. I am a career employee at JPL. Your web site has a substantial following here. I am often amazed at the information you find. Often times you post information about projects before we find out about it here. I was wondering about your comment about the overruns on MSL. Extortion is a pretty strong word. Although JPL is the only place I have ever worked I have been involved in many projects run by other NASA centers. At the working level I am convinced JPL is very competitive value. I have seen examples of projects other places that are struggling that it is pretty obvious to working engineers here that if JPL was running them would have been successful. What are we doing that is so bad? What would we do to be a better value to the American public? These thought are my own as a private citizen and have nothing to do with JPL.
Posted by kcowing at 9:00 AM | Permalink
March 24, 2008What Happened to Kermit The Space Frog?
What gives? Does NASA PAO have something against frogs?
Posted by kcowing at 11:52 PM | Permalink
Today's Video: Everest Expedition 2008 Trailer"Astronaut Scott Parazynski soon sets off for a new expedition. This time, he won't be leaving Earth."
Posted by kcowing at 9:52 PM | Permalink
Home Stretch for Endeavour's Crew
"The space shuttle Endeavour crew is expected to complete its 16-day flight to the International Space Station with a landing at NASA's Kennedy Space Center on Wednesday, March 26. The STS-123 mission began March 11 and delivered the first segment of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's Kibo laboratory and the Canadian Space Agency's two-armed robotic system, known as Dextre. The flight also brought a new crew member to the station and will return an astronaut who has spent nearly seven weeks aboard the complex."
Posted by kcowing at 6:43 PM | Permalink
NASA Gen Y: You Have Things Easy By Comparison
I am headed to Nepal in a few weeks and am hoping to bring my OLPC XO solid state drive laptop with me to Everest Base Camp - as an operational backup for my modified Macbook - and as something to use in the villages Scott and I will visit on our way back down to Kathmandu. - NASA Generation Y Briefing, 2.4 MB PDF
Posted by kcowing at 12:13 AM | Permalink
Everest On Orbit Update
"OK, so Gladys Knight has a better knack for lyrics, but I'm about to depart on a pilgrimage today that I've been dreaming of (and preparing for) my entire life --- a trip that I hope will take me all the way to the summit of Mount Everest." What Gear Does An Astronaut Bring to Climb Mt. Everest?
Scott is also a bit more weight (up mass) conscious than I am. I am bringing a lot of electronic gear and will have two porters carrying my gear. At first I felt like a total wimp (I have climbed 1,000 foot cliffs) to pay someone to carry my stuff. It costs USD $250 to get a duffel bag (I will have 2) to Everest Base Camp and back. Alas, I live at sea level so I am just going to shut up and accept the situation. Then I learned that this number just also happens to be the average annual income for someone in Nepal. As such, I am inclined to think of more things to carry up - and perhaps more porters to pay. I'll also be spending a week or so by myself in a desperately poor third world country trekking at high altitude with two porters and a Sherpa with minimal English skills. It is truly another world that Scott, I, and others will be entering even before we reach Everest Base Camp. NASA Everest Trek Team Biographies
Posted by kcowing at 12:06 AM | Permalink
Team NASA Everest Gear
Team NASA Everest Trek Team Biographies
Posted by kcowing at 12:00 AM | Permalink
March 23, 2008Taking Obama To Task On SpaceNo place for partisans on NASA, space exploration, editorial, Houston Chronicle "Because of the 2008 presidential election, our nation's human spaceflight program is at a perilous crossroad. While Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain all have made allusions to supporting the program, none has made it a priority. In fact, in late 2007 Obama went on record as saying he planned to pay for his $18 billion education plan by taking it out of the hide of NASA. In defending his desire to delay the Orion and Ares programs (the next generation crew spacecraft and rockets), he stressed, "We're not going to have the engineers and scientists to continue space exploration if we don't have kids who are able to read, write and compute."
Posted by kcowing at 3:06 PM | Permalink
Why Bother ExploringMars plan is lost in space, opinion, Washington Times "As I read the plans to bring back rock samples from Mars and build bases on the moon, a few questions come to mind. First, how much do we really want to know about other planets and heavenly bodies? As an extreme example, take Phobos, the moon of Mars. Phobos is a large rock. Photos at reasonable resolution are clearly of scientific value, as would be determination of the type of rock. Beyond that, what is worth knowing? It"s a rock."
Posted by kcowing at 3:05 PM | Permalink
March 22, 2008Childhood's EndSci-fi writer Clarke laid to rest, BBC "Music from the film 2001: A Space Odyssey was played at the funeral and members of the family which had adopted him cried as his coffin was lowered. "Here lies Arthur C Clarke. He never grew up and did not stop growing," his gravestone in Colombo is to read, in accordance with the author's wishes."
Posted by kcowing at 8:13 PM | Permalink
Dom In Space
"Dom Prinzo will end his mission and return to earth on Monday, March 31. Soon after his 7 a.m. wakeup call, he'll be tilted upward in his bed, a few degrees every half hour. He'll be vertical by 11 a.m. Then, maybe a bit like Frankenstein's monster, he'll take his first careful steps after 12 weeks in bed at the Cleveland Clinic."
Posted by kcowing at 12:17 PM | Permalink
March 20, 2008Challenger Center Student Art Contest
"Students of all ages are encouraged to submit their design for a student patch or t-shirt that celebrates the educational aspect of Richard Garriott’s upcoming flight. The student design should symbolize the adventure and discovery of spaceflight from the student’s point of view. The winning student design may appear on both a patch and a t-shirt. Challenger Center for Space Science Education plans to post some of the submitted student’s designs on their national website, and will award the winner with a certificate and t-shirt with his/her design later this year. The design may even get flown into space!"
Posted by kcowing at 7:02 PM | Permalink
Ares 1 Tiger Team Update
"18 March 2008: Sources at NASA rpeort that NASA Ares manager Steve Cook is trying to get a new job (and get out of his current one). Meanwhile, some of you may remember the "Tiger Team" that was assembled to examine Ares 1 vibration issues. Well, sources report that this Tiger Team has been quietly disbanded and its activities have been rolled up into overall project activities. As such, there is no Tiger Team report due for release in March - because there is no Tiger Team to issue it. But there is an internal "Core Team" that now seems to be working toward a presentation of sorts on 9 May 2008."
Posted by kcowing at 2:20 PM | Permalink
Attention Gen Y
A stunning senior moment A self-important college freshman attending a recent football game took it upon himself to explain to a senior citizen sitting next to him why it was impossible for the older generation to understand his generation. 'You grew up in a different world, actually an almost primitive one', the student said, loud enough for many of those nearby to hear. 'The young people of today grew up with television, jet planes, space travel, man walking on the moon. Our space probes have visited Mars. We have nuclear energy, ships and electric and hydrogen cars, cell phones , computers with light-speed processing ... and more.' After a brief silence, the senior citizen responded as follows: 'You're right, son. We didn't have those things when we were young ... so we invented them. Now, you arrogant little s**t, what are you doing for the next generation?' The applause was amazing ... Comments? Send them to nasawatch@spaceref.com. Your comments thus far: Uhhhh... I got about a third of the way thru that "Generation Y Perspective" thing and had to pull out before I barfed. Yes, NASA doesn't "communicate" well with a lot of American sub-groups. Yes, it fails to build enthusiasm for the neat stuff it does. Yes, it presents a cold, bleak, sterile view of the future. And so on, and so on, aand so on. And it's ****ing supposed to! The US government has been dominated for 40 years now by people who DO NOT LIKE large open-ended programs funded by government money. And by people who do not want to get into useless shouting matches with foreign governments about far far distant exploitive Yankee schemes for raping the riches of the solar system. And by people who can't forget that at the very height of the Apollo Program, American cities were being burnt down by people who did not like space programs. And by people who cannot see that the technological and economic limits of 2008 aren't going to apply to the strange and alien world of 2080, or even 2018. We've got a space program. 50 years ago, it sent human beings to the moon. It'd be embarassing to kill it, but the people who run our government don't really want it to thrive, don't want to mount public enthusiasm in its support, don't want to draw up future budgets with hundreds of billions of dollars earmarked for lunar factories and Martian re-oxygenation schemes. They want something nice and small and limited, which does some good and doesn't cause embarrassment, and maybe even seems a bit idealistic. Like the Coast Guard, let's say. It's there, year in and year out, for several centuries now. It does useful work. It hasn't conquered the world on its limited budget, but it does useful work. Does it "communicate" with Gen Y. I don't think so. Does anyone really give a *****, or want to wipe out the Coast Guard because of this egregious failure? I don't think so. Why can't NASA be more like the Coast Guard? The dirty little secret is, NASA is just the Coast Guard. Real or not, that story sounds like it was lifted from one of Ronald Reagan's experiences as Governor of California. You can check it out at http://www.ronaldreagan.com/firstterm.html about 3/4 of the way down the page: "Then their spokesman began: 'Governor, we want to talk to you, but I think you should realize that it's impossible for you to understand us - It's sad, but it's impossible for the members of your generation to understand your own children. You weren't raised in a time of instant communications or satellites and computers solving problems in seconds that previously took hours or days or even weeks to solve. You didn't live in an age of space travel and journeys to the moon, of jet travel or high speed electronics.' While he paused to take a breath, I said: 'You're absolutely right. We didn't have those things when we were your age. We invented them.'" Brilliant response from the "senior citizen". I attended the AIAA Space Exploration Conference in Denver a few weeks ago and found myself quite annoyed by the "Gen Y session". I thought it was self-indulgent, short-sighted, arrogant and brash. Personally, I don't see why this generation is any different than any other earlier generation when they first started entering the work force and had to adapt to the working environment. I'm considered a Gen X'er but would be on the cusp of Gen Y per the presentation made at the Exploration Conference. I saw nothing new in any of the material that I could not apply to myself and others my age, even their suggestions. In fact, I submitted something very similar about using the internet and digital communication more effectively several weeks before to my company. Later that evening, I had a dinner conversation with a colleague of mine who is a somewhat older. He thought it was a very good presentation and was surprised about how Gen Y thinks and goes about things. When I explained how I and others in my age range are very similar he was equally as surprised. The difference was I adapted to the work environment but am still able to retain all those characteristics. I did not see, or have ever seen the point, in holding a conference to say everyone who came before me must adapt to my ways. I guess that's what you get when you're a bit wet behind the ears. As for younger people not being interested in NASA or space exploration, I think they have a point. Not because of any of the reasons they mentioned but because they grew up with the Space Shuttle, as I did. They never saw a person walk on the moon or go beyond LEO, as I never did. It doesn't mean that it's still not difficult to do or even cool. It's just old hat and that rarely captures anyone's imagination regardless of age. If generation Y is so distrustful of corporations & government, why do they always paste Google & Starbucks logos all over their NASA slide shows & vote for more government programs? Having said that, we are in a phase where a very small generation X is being followed by a generation Y which is larger than the first baby boom. If you're in generation X your boss is probably from generation Y simply because of numbers. We've all heard it before. "Gen Y'ers are an army of self-absorbed narcissists with a swollen sense of entitlement. They've been pampered since birth. They have over-sized egos. They're self-indulgent." Sound familiar? As a Baby Boomer, I heard a lot of the same things when I was their age. We created our own culture out of drugs, sex and rock 'n' roll. In the '60s and '70s it was universal wisdom that we suffered from too much coddling. Counselors criticized parents for trying to satisfy their children's' "every desire." Vice President Spiro Agnew once said we were "spoiled brats who never had a good spanking." There are lessons here for the 76 million Gen Y'ers, the 80 million Baby Boomers and the 50 million Gen X'ers. Gen X and Boomers - The Gen Y'ers are not all whining, over-privileged, tech-obsessed brats who don't want to work hard, but still want the benefits. Take a look in the mirror, or at least inside that '77 high school yearbook. Gen Y -- Stop acting like we don't understand you. We were you. As for the Gen Y group peddling the presentation on how to best engage them - give it a rest. We get it. You're cool. We're not. But you'll be surprised by how much smarter WE'LL get as YOU get older. You have Stephen Colbert. We had David Letterman. Oh, and in case you don't believe me, you should take a look inside that same '77 yearbook. Better yet, find one from '69. Keith, There's so much to be said on this topic it isn't funny. I've started writing a blog about this kind of thing. FWIW, I'm 62 but sometimes hang out with people much younger than myself. It comes from being athletic and being a bit of artist. Anyway, here are a few items from my blog that you may find interesting: My blog is titled Independent Broad Minded Centrist. Personally I think there is lots to criticize all around. People need to do more listening. There's too much failure in our society -- especially on the part of people like Dan Goldin who manage to escape from any personal consequences. I'm still appalled that he got paid 1.8 million to go away from Boston University -- when saner, better people than him struggle to make ends meet. Great story Keith! Although it does sound a little like one of those sentimental email stories that is attributed to everyone from Genghis Khan to Ted Nugent, that is a great come-back that I am definitely going to use myself! :-) In light of the living-world's loss of Sir Arthur Clarke this week, who indeed (from this new generation of expected entitlement), is going to invent the next great achievement in space-tech, merely by writing a story for a SciFi periodical, decades before the technology needed to do it is even created?! Not that each generation of youth doesn't have the spark of "imagineering" in their hearts, but if necessity is the mother of invention, kids whose needs are met in an instant might not be as creative as those who have gone before them and had to strive to achieve. Let's hope that the great kids of today who work hard will outshine the others. Enjoying your website and stories as always, Brilliant response from the "senior citizen". I attended the AIAA Space Exploration Conference in Denver a few weeks ago and found myself quite annoyed by the "Gen Y session". I thought it was self-indulgent, short-sighted, arrogant and brash. Personally, I don't see why this generation is any different than any other earlier generation when they first started entering the work force and had to adapt to the working environment. I'm considered a Gen X'er but would be on the cusp of Gen Y per the presentation made at the Exploration Conference. I saw nothing new in any of the material that I could not apply to myself and others my age, even their suggestions. In fact, I submitted something very similar about using the internet and digital communication more effectively several weeks before to my company. Later that evening, I had a dinner conversation with a colleague of mine who is a somewhat older. He thought it was a very good presentation and was surprised about how Gen Y thinks and goes about things. When I explained how I and others in my age range are very similar he was equally as surprised. The difference was I adapted to the work environment but am still able to retain all those characteristics. I did not see, or have ever seen the point, in holding a conference to say everyone who came before me must adapt to my ways. I guess that's what you get when you're a bit wet behind the ears. As for younger people not being interested in NASA or space exploration, I think they have a point. Not because of any of the reasons they mentioned but because they grew up with the Space Shuttle, as I did. They never saw a person walk on the moon or go beyond LEO, as I never did. It doesn't mean that it's still not difficult to do or even cool. It's just old hat and that rarely captures anyone's imagination regardless of age. If generation Y is so distrustful of corporations & government, why do they always paste Google & Starbucks logos all over their NASA slide shows & vote for more government programs? Having said that, we are in a phase where a very small generation X is being followed by a generation Y which is larger than the first baby boom. If you're in generation X your boss is probably from generation Y simply because of numbers. The purported dialogue has the feel of something that's been embellished or fabricated, but the sentiment (if not the conversation itself) is something that's probably been expressed quite often. Given the threat of an impending shortage of engineers and scientists and retirement of older engineers and scientists, a more formal effort at passing along knowledge (technical knowledge, ethics, approaches at problem solving, etc.) probably would be a very good idea. The communication really needs to go both ways.
Posted by kcowing at 10:53 AM | Permalink
NASA History According to Dean Acosta
"Before Qorvis, I served as chief spokesperson, press secretary and deputy assistant administrator for public affairs at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). I led NASA's public affairs and communications activities during one of its most challenging periods following the space shuttle Columbia accident in 2003."
Keith, I wanted to point out a factual error in your latest post. I don't think Glenn Mahone was involved with NASA public affairs after Challenger. As for my Linkedin profile, as I tried to explain in our communication a month ago--"leading NASA public affairs and communications following the Columbia accident" covers the period of time all the way up until return to flight. I was the press secretary and acting assistant adminstrator for public affairs the months leading up to the Return to Flight mission (following the Columbia accident). I was fortunate to lead a terrific team of NASA communicators and thankful for my opportunity to work for this Administration. By the way, Glenn Mahone was also a political appointee under President Bush. Dean Acosta
Posted by kcowing at 9:09 AM | Permalink
David Low ObituaryG. David Low, 52: Cerebral Astronaut Flew on 3 Shuttles, Washington Post "G. David Low, 52, a NASA astronaut who served on three space shuttle missions before becoming a space industry executive, died March 15 of colon cancer at Reston Hospital Center. During his 12 years as an astronaut, he logged more than 714 hours in space while circling the Earth more than 540 times."
Posted by kcowing at 9:05 AM | Permalink
March 19, 2008NASA Culture Survey"The analysis of the 2007 NASA Culture Survey (NCS) results was part of a broader study that included focus groups, center assessments, literature searches and the additional comments provided by survey respondents. The overall findings were presented at a Senior Management Council in January 2008, and a determination was made that more can be expected across our organization regarding open communications and organizational support in getting the job done."
Posted by kcowing at 7:33 PM | Permalink
Barbara Morgan Gets Challenger Center Award"On March 19th at the George Bush Presidential Library in College Station, Texas, Challenger Center for Space Science Education and former President George H.W. Bush presented NASA Educator Astronaut Barbara Morgan with Challenger Center's top honor, The President George H. W. Bush Award. The award was first given to President and Mrs. George H.W. Bush in 1995 for their support in continuing the mission of the Challenger 51-L crew that was tragically lost in 1986. Prior to the ceremony Barbara Morgan gave a brief presentation sponsored by the Marilyn Kent Byrne Student Success Center to students from Texas A&M."
Posted by kcowing at 6:06 PM | Permalink
Huntsville Is Allowing Its Own History to Rot
"In March of 2007 the temporary weather cover put in place by the volunteers was blown off one third of the low deck during a storm. Despite repeated requests to the curator and CEO of the US Space and Rocket Center, no effort has been made to pull the weather cover back in place. It's now been one year. This is blind neglect of a historic space artifact."
Posted by kcowing at 4:08 PM | Permalink
Space Adventures Buys ZeroG
Posted by kcowing at 1:13 PM | Permalink
Hubble Update Today
"NASA will hold a media teleconference at 2 p.m. EDT on Wednesday, March 19, to report on the first-ever detection of the organic molecule methane in the atmosphere of a planet orbiting a distant star. Though the planet is too hot to support life as we know it, the finding demonstrates the ability to detect organic molecules spectroscopically around Earth-like planets in habitable zones around stars."
Posted by kcowing at 1:02 PM | Permalink
Arthur C. Clarke Has Died
NASA Statement on the Death of Arthur C. Clarke Sir Arthur C. Clarke Has Died, Marc Boucher, Space Elevator Reference "It is with a heavy heart I write that Sir Arthur C. Clarke has died. He died early Wednesday at a hospital in Colombo, Sri Lanka. I had the privilege to meet Sir Arthur in 1997 in Sri Lanka, his home of 52 years. His creative mind inspired many people including myself. He will be missed but his creativity will live on through the people he inspired." Sir Arthur C. Clarke Has Died, Keith Cowing, SpaceRef "Noted author and visionary Sir Arthur C. Clarke has died at age of 90 in Sri Lanka. I am not even certain where to begin to describe just how profoundly this man's writing affected me as a child - and as an adult." Arthur C. Clarke, Wikipedia The Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse, SpaceRef Video (below): Sir Arthur Clarke Speaks on his 90th Birthday, December 2007
Posted by kcowing at 11:06 AM | Permalink
March 18, 2008Challenger Center News
"Richard Garriott is a preeminent game developer and son of NASA Skylab Astronaut Owen Garriott. As the next civilian to fly into space, Richard plans to follow the lead of Educator Astronaut Barbara Morgan, STS-118, through interactive lessons that will motivate and inspire students. His flight is currently scheduled for lift-off to the International Space Station on October 12, 2008. Richard is a former student of Dr. June Scobee Rodgers, the Founding Chairman of Challenger Center for Space Science Education and widow of that flight's Commander, Dick Scobee."
Posted by kcowing at 1:27 PM | Permalink
New Uses For Old SpacecraftNASA Request for Information: New Science Investigations Using Existing NASA Spacecraft "NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD) currently sponsors approximately 85 flight missions, involving over 90 spacecraft, divided between missions in development and missions in operations. One of SMD's programmatic objectives is to maximize the science return for the Nation within the available budget. This Request for Information (RFI) solicits input from the broad space science community that would contribute to NASA's study of possible new uses for current NASA spacecraft beyond their current missions. Responses to this RFI (NNH08ZDA005L) will be used to inform NASA's program planning."
Posted by kcowing at 11:34 AM | Permalink
David Low Has Died
Posted by kcowing at 9:52 AM | Permalink
March 17, 2008Yet Another New NASA AcronymNASA STS-123 Execute Package FD07 "We've been thinking hard about wear and tear on EMU gloves, and you'll be glad to know we have a prototype solution in the works. It's called the Mmod Resistant Handling Aid for Normal Dexterity (MR HAND). Here is one of our technicians modeling MR HAND."
Posted by kcowing at 5:30 PM | Permalink
March 14, 2008Griffin's CoronationFSC Cites Administrator of NASA
Posted by kcowing at 3:51 PM | Permalink
Just What JSC PAO Needs - An Overt Bush Politico
Safety Chief in Holding Pattern - Relations With Colleagues Called Frosty and Petty "Engleman Conners has not been popular among her peers at the board. Last year, she got into a high-profile spat with three of the four other board members that led to members' not speaking to one another and Engleman Conners working much of the time from the NTSB Academy in Ashburn, Va., rather than at headquarters in Washington." New Strife at the NTSB under Engleman-Connors Leadership "NTSB members are strongly dissatisfied with the way in which Board chairman Ellen Engleman Conners is attempting to curb their activities. Three Board members-Carol Carmody, Richard Healing and Deborah Hersman-sent a letter to the chairman late this summer expressing their concerns." Transportation safety board's Engleman Conners withdraws nomination for second chairmanship term, Progressive Railroading "National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) member Ellen Engleman Conners recently sent a letter to President Bush to withdraw her nomination for a second term as board chairman. The president nominated her in April." Exiting From the Game Doesn't Dispel Clouds, WS Journal "MOVING OVER: National Transportation Safety Board insiders twitter over the FCC's hiring of former chairwoman Ellen Engleman Conners for the managing director's office. Internal strife marred Conners's three-year NTSB term, where complaints, including from fellow Republicans, ranged from how she resolved a backlog of safety issues to how she divvied up office supplies." Safety Chief in Holding Pattern - Relations With Colleagues Called Frosty and Petty "She often joked to colleagues that she was determined to live the life of a spinster aboard her houseboat on the Potomac with her five cats -- each of which had its own life preserver."
Posted by kcowing at 3:38 PM | Permalink
Sean O'Keefe Is Heading Back To WashingtonSean O'Keefe To Head GE Aviation's Washington D.C. Operations "Effective June 2, Sean O'Keefe, 52, will head GE Aviation's Washington D.C. operations, replacing Dr. Thomas Cooper, who is retiring after serving in the role with distinction for 21 years."
Posted by kcowing at 9:03 AM | Permalink
March 13, 2008Hey Dextre, Wake UpNASA struggles to wake space station robot, USA Today "The International Space Station's new $210 million robot, a two-armed giant named Dextre, refused to come to life on command Thursday, jeopardizing NASA's plans to get the robot up and running over the next week. Mission Control tried to power up the robot's pieces early Thursday soon after they were installed on the station, but there was no response. Engineers plan to make a software fix sometime after 5 a.m. ET Friday that might wake the robot from its sleep."
Posted by kcowing at 10:38 PM | Permalink
NASA FY09 Science Budget Hearing"Added Udall, "NASA's challenging new science initiatives are to be built on a budget that increases by only 1% through FY11, and that assumes only inflationary increases at best in the years beyond that. There will be little new money--instead, there will be a continuing need to transfer of funds across the science accounts to support each new initiative--an approach some might call 'robbing Peter to pay Paul'. I'm very concerned that such an approach will not prove sustainable or credible." Witnesses: FY 2009 NASA Science Budget Makes Best of Limited Resources Statement of Alan Stern
Posted by kcowing at 8:49 PM | Permalink
Increasing The Value of ISS
"Today, you will open up the JLP and add to the total square footage of ISS. The Harris County tax assessors estimate that this will increase the value of the station by $43.6 M, and the millage rates will be increased accordingly. We may have to dip into your per diem as we had not counted on the higher resulting rent for your crew. The good news is that if we add a bathroom and bamboo flooring to the JLP, we can more than double that assessed value in resale price!"
Posted by kcowing at 6:11 PM | Permalink
Which One Of You Kids Left Your iPod On The Dashboard?
"If you look into the window of Space Shuttle Endeavour, as viewed in this photograph taken yesterday from inside the International Space Station, you will see that someone left their iPod on near the co-pilot's window. This is not the first time that an iPod has been photographed in space, but it is the first time that one has been photographed inside one space vehicle - by someone inside another space vehicle."
Posted by kcowing at 3:23 PM | Permalink
Understanding and Protecting the Home PlanetRemarks by NASA Administrator Griffin to the 39th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference "Talking about the Space Act reminds me of the kerfluffle that ensued, a couple of years ago, when I changed our mission statement to be consistent with our legislated responsibilities. I thought the ensuing squabble was "Much Ado About Nothing", and that a larger point was missed." Senators Collins and Lieberman Raise Concerns about Changes to NASA Mission Statement (August 2006) "Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Joe Lieberman (D-CT) sent a letter to National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Administrator Dr. Michael D. Griffin expressing concerns about the organization's elimination from its mission statement of the phrase "to understand and protect the home planet."
Posted by kcowing at 2:43 PM | Permalink
Griffin on NASA and EducationMichael Griffin Redux, Starstryder (Blog) Grad Student: How do we convince the Government to get us money? Griffin: We're not allowed to lobby Congress Grad Student: NASA Produces great educational materials Griffin: Yes we do, but ... Let me remind you that NASA is not the department of education. NASA spends $15 million each year on education - that's enough money for one more Discovery mission, and we can't do that mission because of the education we do. I'm not saying that is money badly spent, but ... NASA is the only thing in the domestic discretionary part of the Federal budget that hasn't received cuts. Grad Student: I'm not trying to make fun of NASA - I'm trying to say I want to live in a world in 30 years where people are better educated in Science, Math, and Technology Griffin: That's not NASA's job Grad Student: (pause) Do you have any insights from your work with politicians on how we can get more science education? Griffin: I don't generally get any insights from politicians
Posted by kcowing at 1:24 PM | Permalink
Endeavour Docks With ISS
"Space shuttle Endeavour docked successfully to the International Space Station at 11:49 p.m. EDT. About an hour before docking, STS-123 Commander Dominic Gorie and Pilot Gregory H. Johnson guided the shuttle through a back-flip maneuver, giving the Expedition 16 crew the opportunity to take pictures of the orbiter's protective heat-resistant tiles. These photos will be sent to engineers on Earth for analysis." Additional ISS and Shuttle news
Posted by kcowing at 12:04 AM | Permalink
March 12, 2008Barnstorming Over Enceladus
As scheduled, no contact was made with the spacecraft until around 7:00 PM PST today. Science data collection was been completed and Cassini has reoriented itself so as to point at Earth and play back the data that was collected. This playback will continue until tomorrow afternoon. Early science results may be available Thursday afternoon. Cassini Spacecraft to Dive Into Water Plume of Saturn Moon "NASA's Cassini spacecraft will make an unprecedented "in your face" flyby of Saturn's moon Enceladus on Wed., March 12. The spacecraft, orchestrating its closest approach to date, will skirt along the edges of huge Old-Faithful-like geysers erupting from giant fractures on the south pole of Enceladus. Cassini will sample scientifically valuable water-ice, dust and gas in the plume."
Posted by kcowing at 10:29 PM | Permalink
Mike Griffin on Gen Y and His College DaysNASA chief addresses the Gen-Y problem. Does he care?, Houston Chronicle "I've got to say that, yeah, young people are not as motivated by space as we would like. But I remember also when I was young and I was motivated by other things. I used to say when I was in college my primary career was golf in the daytime and girls at night, and if I had time I would attend class. I don't think I was atypical from young people then or today."
Posted by kcowing at 4:59 PM | Permalink
| ||||||||||||||||||||||