May 1, 2008
Kathleen Connell Joins NASA Watch as a Guest Blogger
Thank you to NASA Watch for inviting guest bloggers like myself to post on this nicely remodeled site.
My focus is on "space solutions of benefit to humanity," which I discuss on my blog, http://www.missiontohumanity.com. I suspect that if we, in the U.S., attempted to generate measurable returns on the public space investment as a matter of space policy, we might well see more national support for an increase in our public sector space budget. In an era of many crushing demands on the U.S. taxpayer, tangible returns from every public investment are critical.
National and global challenges, including global warming, health advances, natural disaster mitigation, aging populations, societal parity for women and children, universal education, poverty, clean economic development, and international space economic development partnerships are all areas in which space can provide constructive solutions.
I welcome your views on this topic, as well as suggestions about how to grow a robust space portfolio focused on returns for the U.S. taxpayer and for all humankind.
So with this brief introduction to a complex topic, I want to ask the NASA Watch community a question: Over the next decade, should the United States commit to both space exploration and intentional space solutions to American and global challenges? Thanks in advance for your views.
Posted by Keith Cowing at May 1, 2008 3:41 PM
Welcome to NASA Watch, Kathleen!
Posted by: Keith Cowing at May 1, 2008 4:20 PMWelcome Kathleen, you've come to NASA Watch at a great time. I'm looking forward to reading your posts.
Posted by: Marc Boucher at May 1, 2008 4:27 PMHi, Kathleen!
I think your question is fantastic. And the answer is "no", but not for the reason one might expect.
In sum, if Space Exploration isn't achieving or enabling the latter set of objectives, then it's failing to be relevant.
And therefore I would not do both, I would only do the latter, because that would include affordable and sustainable exploration.
Exploration for its own sake, just to say we did it, or as the modern day equivalent of pyramids (e.g. national ego), or because we must give NASA something to do, is not politically or financially sustainable, and therefore not worth doing.
Hope this stirs the pot a bit...


