Frank's Note: Check out this report on federal campaign contributions for last year's campaign cycle at Open Secrets
Honeywell lead the defense/aerospace sector with a total contributions of $2.5 million. Lockheed was right behind at $1.6 million and Boeing in third place at $1.3 million. Interestingly enough, their contributions were almost evenly divided between Dems and the GOP, with Dems slightly ahead in the dollars donated. Of course, from the perspective of the aerospace giants, this just makes good (political) sense. But how do readers think change will come about if the status quo is so well represented?


There will be NO change if they do not fund COTS-D and since they will not according to: http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2009/04/congressional_b.html
Status quo will stay and that'll be it:
. How many people employed by the usual defense contractors who are potential voters? 10s of 1000s.
. How many in the COTS-D contenders? A few hundreds.
. What is most important to Congress? Being elected.
Fairly simple problem isn't it?