Aderholt Asks GAO To Investigate NASA's Constellation Activities for Possible Illegal Activity
"Congressman Robert Aderholt (R-AL) on Friday wrote a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) asking for an investigation into whether NASA's actions regarding the Constellation program, as well as the extent to which it is working on a new, unauthorized plan, violates law. On February 1, 2010, the President Obama Administration announced its FY2011 Budget, which proposes to eliminate the NASA Constellation program. Since that time, NASA has cancelled or put on hold numerous contracts which were a part of the regular, FY10 work for the Constellation program, despite the fact that Congress must first approve its termination before it becomes final policy."


Two major fallacies in this argument. Specifically, that
* Stopping the initiation of a contract is equivalent to canceling a contract.
* Defining and describing an alternative plan is equivalent to implementing that plan.
Both are false. This ploy is on very thin legal ice. It seems intended only to stifle the debate rather than win it with reason. The central issue is whether CxP is the best program moving forward, but this gambit does nothing to advance that discussion.