Charlie Bolden's BP Moment

NASA boss investigated for possible conflict of interest on biofuel project

"While millions of barrels of spilled oil choke the Gulf of Mexico, NASA is working on an ocean-based biofuels venture that could revolutionize clean-energy production at sea and treat wastewater at the same time. The scientist running the $10 million experiment, called Project OMEGA, uses words such as groundbreaking and exciting to describe his baby. But there's a hitch. NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden doesn't believe in OMEGA -- and has sought to slow it down. The reason: He was advised against it by Marathon Oil -- the Texas-based company on whose board Bolden sat until he was named NASA administrator last year. The former astronaut and Marine Corps general also still holds as much as $1 million worth of Marathon stock. ...

... Bolden sat on the Marathon board from 2003 until last year, when President Barack Obama named him NASA administrator. When he left the board, according to his 2009 financial disclosure statement, Bolden received Marathon stock equivalents valued at the time between $500,000 and $1 million. In a brief interview, Bolden confirmed that he still holds the Marathon stock but said that he does not think there was any conflict of interest in his reaching out to the company. He directed further questions to NASA's general counsel. "I am not supposed to talk to you [about this]," he said."

NASA Develops Algae Bioreactor as a Sustainable Energy Source, NASA

"As a clean energy alternative, NASA invented an algae photo-bioreactor that grows algae in municipal wastewater to produce biofuel and a variety of other products. The NASA bioreactor is an Offshore Membrane Enclosure for Growing Algae (OMEGA), which won't compete with agriculture for land, fertilizer, or freshwater. NASA's Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., licensed the patent-pending algae photo-bioreactor to Algae Systems, LLC, Carson City, Nev., which plans to develop and pilot the technology in Tampa Bay, Fla. The company plans to refine and integrate the NASA technology into biorefineries to produce renewable energy products, including diesel and jet fuel."

NASA bags algae, wastewater in bid for aviation fuel, NY Times

"NASA is applying space technology to a decidedly down-to-earth effort that links the production of algae-based fuel with an inexpensive method of sewage treatment. The space agency is growing algae for biofuel in plastic bags of sewage floating in the ocean."

Algae OMEGA, California Energy Commission

"The objective of this research is to improve and advance direct biosynthetic technologies that demonstrate the potential to supply transportation fuels for California in order to: ... Create new in-state fuel production options along with their associated economic development and employment opportunities."

Bolden at Center of NASA Biofuels Controversy [Orlando Sentinel], Space News

NASA Administrator Target Of Ethics Investigation, MyStateline.com


Advertise Here

11 Comments

| Leave a comment

While this issue deserves to be looked into, I agree with Bolden's comments from the article. Biofuels are important work, but don't seem to be too related to any of NASA's missions:

"In his response, Bolden said that he agreed — and that he was unconvinced NASA should even be leading any biofuels research.

"I am not even certain how much we should be investing in alternative fuels development as a lead agency, since we have been approached by other agencies who do have this responsibility to assist them," Bolden wrote on April 6."

But there's another hitch. This work seems to have absolutely nothing to do with aeronautics or space and, unless I'm forgetting something, has nothing to do with the goals for NASA as laid out in the Space Act.

This sounds like great stuff, but if NASA is spending $10M on ocean-based biofuels that could be used on projects that align better with NASA goals, then Bolden should pull the plug on it asap, and recommend it to another agency for funding.

I guess one could presume that this work might be of value for closed-loop life support in some far future space colony, but if the investigator is selling it as providing a replacement for oil drilling, then it probably doesn't belong at NASA.

If Keith will permit a quote from the article: "Trent stressed that Bolden has not withheld funding or threatened to cancel the project. However, in e-mails to NASA officials in April and May, he worried that Bolden's consultation with Marathon might ultimately damage the program."
No. Damaging the reputation of NASA and it's Administrator is much more important!

Reading between the lines, this is a storm in a teacup brewed to create a profile for more funding. The direct advantage to NASA is slim. As the process, as advertised, would need much work to be incorporated into closed cycle LSS. Much better if the algae were producing complex carbohydrates or even a foodstock for fish such as tilapia. And as for fueling a Kerolox engine that hasn't been developed...

Thus it would seem that Admin. Bolden is correct in his assessment that NASA should not be the "Lead Agency" for the project. DoE or Navy seem the better partner.

Was Pete Worden really "infuriated" or "angry" as the article states?

And if the process does get funding is this the best way to go about it?

The NASA IG will have the final say but that won't stop the commentators...

No win situation. He'd also get in trouble for endorsing it. Oh, Bolden is in the pocket of the energy industry, they'd say.

Though energy production is an important issue I don't see NASA trying to build a fusion reactor and that could at least be used in space. This looks to be a very Earth based research project and one that would be better suited for the Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE received an increase its annual budget to $26.4 billion last year and received an additional $38.3 billion under the $789 billion stimulus package. Since a lot of that additional money was for alternative energy development I think the DOE would be a much more logical choice for funding this research project.

It seems to me that developing bio-jet fuel for aviation is akin to developing liquid hydrogen fuel for rockets. Both are part of NASA's mission and have 'green' applications.

I like Charlie, but WTF was he thinking asking Marathon Oil to evaluate such a scheme? Thanks to their rival BP, you can indeed extract jet fuel directly from sea water now =/

There is enough argument for the OMEGA project to remain under NASA's authority if you think about it.

First off, NASA has had a long and clear history of jet and rocket fuel research, and the OMEGA project has always been targeted toward creating BioDiesel and Jet Fuels. This is the 1st 'A' in NASA...

Secondly, a quick peek at the Space Act of 1958 as amended in 1976 will find the following
Section 203(b)(1):
appropriated funds, initiate, support, and carry out such research, development, demonstration, and other related activities in ground propulsion technologies as are provided for in sections 4 through 10 of the Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1976.

While I will concede that the actual text of the Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1976 focuses on batteries and doesn't mention alternative fuel development, the intent of the law is clear and there are enough vague statements that would support the OMEGA project as being withing NASA's purview.

A yes-man for BO is also a yes-man for Marathon Oil? Who would have thunk it?

There does seem to be a NASA connection here related to ISRU. (yes pretty soon I will be able to link Spiderman to ISRU).

This algae in sewage would be great to process waste at a lunar or Mars base while generating fuel in the process. It is my understanding that this was at least partially the reason that this research was done in the beginning. That it grew beyond this is just a bonus.

The article was never clear on exactly who wrote the check for this research on OMEGA that is currently going on. Was it the Navy or NASA?

NASA had a long history of working on Fuels for aircraft. The divisions were gradually reduced over time. When all branches of the military identified dependence on foreign energy as a national security issue, the few remaining personal were brought back to this line of work. Adapting work to the SOA and needs is exactly what most would expect the government to do.

Presently, Military jets have flown on biofuel and in Jan 2010, Continental jet 516 took off in Houston with one of its two engines powered by a 50-50 blend of jet biofuel and petroleum-based kerosene.

"The properties of the fuel are fabulous, in fact, the bio part of the blend has a lower freeze point than Jet A,"

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=air-algae-us-biofuel-flight-on-weeds-and-pond-scum


This seems like valuable research and a meritorious venture so I don't mind it being continued within NASA (Aeronautics or ISRU) or within DOE, but would hope that this continues either way.

Leave a comment




calendar

Events
Launches
Your Event

Monthly Archives

Mortgage Lead

Play online bingo at the top bingo sites.

Interested in Space Travel, try the next best thing, name your own star.

Online Bingo

Hier finden Sie die neuesten Casino Bonus Codes von fuhrenden Gaming-Sites.

Forex like a Pro with a leading forex broker.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Keith Cowing published on June 20, 2010 12:28 PM.

This Week in Space - Griffin's Spin On Things was the previous entry in this blog.

Charlie Bolden Likes To Travel (Too Much?) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



- Find brilliant bingo sites and start to win

-

- Trade Forex like a Pro

- Die besten Seiten fur online roulette spielen, Spielstrategien und Tipps.