|
Category: Election 2008 ArchivesApril 16, 2009Oiling the WheelsFrank's Note: Check out this report on federal campaign contributions for last year's campaign cycle at Open Secrets Honeywell lead the defense/aerospace sector with a total contributions of $2.5 million. Lockheed was right behind at $1.6 million and Boeing in third place at $1.3 million. Interestingly enough, their contributions were almost evenly divided between Dems and the GOP, with Dems slightly ahead in the dollars donated. Of course, from the perspective of the aerospace giants, this just makes good (political) sense. But how do readers think change will come about if the status quo is so well represented? November 5, 2008Local Elections
"Republican Pete Olson is celebrating his success returning a heavily Republican, suburban Houston congressional district to GOP control. Olson ousted Democratic Rep. Nick Lampson in Tuesday's election." Democrats Kosmas, Grayson defeat GOP veterans Keller, Feeney, Orlando Sentinel "I got licked," Feeney said in a short concession speech to supporters, some of whom were in tears. "There are differences between me and Kosmas, but I wish her well." Democrat takes seat vacated by Cramer, Huntsville Times "After one of the most contentious congressional races in recent history, the 5th Congressional District has a new U.S. representative in Parker Griffith." November 4, 2008IFPTE on Election 2008
"It is has been a hard 8 years for NASA. President Bush's initial mistake was to downsize, outsource, and undermine the technical independence of NASA's civil-servant workforce. The Republican plan was to eliminate about a fifth of its independent in-house experts and most civil-service protections. This nave ideology, that federal laboratories such as NASA should be run like a private business with the cold, untechnical perspective of a bean-counter, tragically contributed to the Columbia disaster and led to the subsequent hurried and flawed planning for President Bush's Vision for Space Exploration." October 30, 2008Obama Space Policy News
"On Saturday, November 1, former Apollo crew member Rusty Schweickart will launch final canvassing and Get Out the Vote efforts for the Obama-Biden campaign. Schweikart will then join the Obamanauts - Space Coast residents who support Barack Obama - along with hundreds of volunteers from every corner of the state to knock on doors this weekend to personally contact thousands of voters before Election Day and encourage them to take advantage of the last days of early voting." Diamandis editorial supports Obama Space Policy "Responding largely to concerns voiced by Florida's voters, Senator Obama has offered an unambiguous pledge to right-size NASA's budget. But his space policy is not devoted solely to NASA; it points to an Obama Administration's support for space commercialization, space workforce retention, space research and technology development, national security space programs, space-based environmental monitoring, and using space to inspire our nation's youth to excel in math and science." McCain Changes Stance on NASA Funding
"I will freeze government spending on all but the most important programs like defense, veterans care, NASA, Social Security and health care until we scrub every single government program and get rid of the ones that aren't working for the American people. And I will veto every single pork barrel bill Congresses passes." He Did It Again: In Ormond Beach, McCain Pledges Spending Freeze with No Exception for NASA October 29, 2008Sally Ride on Space, Education, and the Election
"Somewhere in America today, there's a 10-year-old girl who could be the first person to walk on Mars. She's probably playing with a toy chemistry set or a kid's telescope right now, gazing up at the heavens and dreaming big dreams. I know a lot about that girl because in 1961, during the inspirational early days of our space program, that was me. The world that girl will enter, and in particular the state of our space and science industries, is different for her than it was for me. In some ways, she has greater opportunities. While still unacceptably behind men, women have more avenues to becoming scientists today than they did when I answered a call in a newspaper ad to become an astronaut. In other ways, our space program has lost the national stature it had when I was growing up. In both regards, though, we can and must do better." October 28, 2008Obama Prefers Spock - The REAL One
Video below Biden on Space Policy
"When John F. Kennedy challenged the nation to go to the moon, he noted that the space industry not only demanded the best minds, it also created the best jobs. Ladies and gentlemen, the objective was not just to go to the moon. But it was to get another 435,000 engineers and scientists and mathematicians. When the Shuttle is retired, NASA estimates that 3,500 jobs could be lost - and that doesn't count the impact on local businesses or the long-term cost of allowing our global leadership to atrophy. The Bush Administration has left our space program in a very difficult position. And John McCain, as Chairman of the Commerce Committee hasn't helped. He oversaw the plan to retire the Space Shuttle before a replacement was ready." October 23, 2008Obama Campaign Hits McCain Again on NASA in Florida
A Speech That I'd Like To See The Next President Deliver
Delivered XX, XXXXX 2009 Last Fall we celebrated NASA's 50th anniversary. When you celebrate such events you always look back - and look forward. NASA is made of people - and people pause and reflect. NASA is no different. As we look back at NASA's history we see stunning accomplishments, difficult challenges, heartbreaks, roaring resurgence, and continued exploration. Yet as with any human endeavor, reaching age 50 calls for some introspection and some re-prioritization. In 2004 NASA was given an opportunity it had not had for a generation - a new commitment to the human exploration of other worlds. This happened barely a year after the agency suffered the tragic loss of Columbia and her crew. The President of the United States of America came to NASA to give the agency its new "vision". With a renewed commitment to explore, NASA set forth to develop the plans and hardware needed to implement this new era of human exploration. However, within a short time, NASA fell back on bad habits. Discarding the wisdom of the marketplace and a bounty of external ideas, it discarded this advice, and picked an architecture that relied upon re-designing existing hardware under the guise of reusing it. And there was no back up plan in case things did not work out. All too soon, things did not work out and America's replacement for the Space Shuttle's crew carrying capability slipped further into the future. The gap between the retirement of the Space Shuttle and its replacement grew when the wisest course would have been to shrink it - indeed, to eliminate it. When the President announced NASA's new plans, he said that the Space Shuttle would be retired once the International Space Station would be completed. Within a short period of time, however, NASA reinterpreted that guidance and said that the shuttle will be retired on a certain date and that the resulting space station - however incomplete - would be finished. At the same time, NASA began to speak of the space station, something it had fought to build for two decades, as something it would no longer need- and indeed, it would walk away from - just as it was capable of doing all of the things NASA had been claiming it would. Indeed, some at NASA referred to this marvel of engineering as a "mistake". Returning the shuttle to flight status took much longer than expected. It was also much more expensive. Katrina devastated some of NASA's infrastructure. NASA had a tough path ahead. This new vision for space exploration would not be cheap. NASA was promised the funds. Congress signed off on the plans. But when things got tough, the money was not there - the reasons for this were complex (as they always are in Washington) and NASA was left with a plan to do more - with much less than it needed to accomplish its tasks. The vision, once clear, had now become clouded. NASA also developed a bad case of attention deficit disorder. A scant 4 years after it was announced, NASA's new exploration mission was stuck in a sand bar when it should have been leaving port. The vision's intent was not unwise. America was founded by explorers - prehistoric and much more recent. America has lead in the exploration of our world, our solar system - our universe. So it is not at all out of character for us to seek to lead a renewed course of exploration - to pick up unfinished business on the moon we abandoned a generation ago and to move on to new challenges and destinations. However flawed the implementation of the vision has been, that can and must be fixed. It can be fixed by adhering to the maxim suggested by Frank Lloyd Wright: “form follows function”. NASA must be retuned and reformatted to be 21st century compliant. In so doing we must never throw out old ways of doing things if they still work and are best to accomplish a task. That said, NASA, often referred in iconic fashion as a bastion of rocket science and overall smarts, needs to be able to use both supercomputers as well as the same tools that kids in 7th grade make use of without thinking. The oft-used phrase "If we can put a man on the moon ..." should no longer be an excuse for why someone else cannot do something hard. Rather, It should be a challenge - a rallying cry - to do it again - and do it better - and then to do even harder things. Because that is what we Americans thrive upon: a challenge to go where no one has gone before. Yes, I know who first said that. So how do we do this? Instead of adopting a policy whereby we walk away from our space infrastructure we should embrace an approach whereby we utilize what we have until - and unless - we have a capability to replace it. If we continue the long process of creating projects only to abandon them for something else we will not only waste taxpayer funds, we will utilize previous political capital as well. Instead of a monolithic architecture that has few if any entry points for new partners in a global plan for exploration of space, an open source approach should be adopted - one whereby nations, companies, and other entities can leverage their capabilities and expertise in multiple ways. One size does not fit all when it comes to participating in space exploration. NASA needs to re-engage with all Americans. NASA should once again strive to be relevant to every American in their daily lives in both a practical and inspirational way. NASA should to seek out the active participation of all Americans in its science, education, technology, and exploration activities. There is a phrase many space exploration afficandos like to use: "The meek shall inherit the Earth. The rest of us will go to the stars." OK, that's a little edgy - but I can identify with that. But not everyone wants to climb into a rocketship and play Buck Rogers. But we all want to watch. I prefer another phrase, however - one uttered by Anne Herbert back in 1978. She said "The sky starts at your feet. Think how brave you are to walk around." We are all explorers - each in our own way - everyday. NASA is a place where dreams power reality. It has drifted a bit. I will put it back on track. But I need your help. You will know that NASA's efforts in this regard will be complete when a child in a rural community - or one in an economically challenged neighborhood - looks up at the sky at night and sees her future - and knows how to make it happen. We should all explore space - every day - together. THAT is what NASA shall recommit itself to doing. We all get to go. We all get to explore. We all become inspired. Thank you. October 22, 2008Obama on Chandrayaan-1 Launch
"As a child, I remember sitting on my grandfather's shoulders and watching the Apollo astronauts return from a splashdown to Hickam Air Force Base, dreaming of where they had been. It inspired my imagination and gave me confidence in what we as Americans could achieve. It's time for a space program that inspires our children again. As President, I will lead our space program boldly into the 21st Century - so when my daughters, and all our children, look up to the skies, they see Americans leading the way into the deepest reaches of our solar system." October 20, 2008Obama Hits McCain on Space via RadioObama Hits McCain On Health Care, NASA, National Journal "Obama also released a radio spot in Florida Thursday accusing McCain of wanting to cut NASA funding, an argument that turns on McCain's proposal to enact a spending freeze to close the budget deficit. McCain "wants to freeze NASA spending at last year's level," says Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., in the ad. "So layoffs would loom larger, and NASA would continue to be starved of funds for future exploration." October 18, 2008McCain Pledges Money and Support for NASA
"Sen. John McCain came to the space coast today and promised $2 billion to help NASA transition from the space shuttle to a new space vehicle. "I've always been a strong supporter of manned space flight and NASA," he said in a community that is home to many in the field. "If I'm elected president I won't cut NASA funds like Sen. Obama." McCain aides noted that Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, had promised to pay for education programs by delaying the Constellation space program, which is meant to fill the gap to the next space vehicle, only to backtrack later." John McCain campaigns in Melbourne, seeks Space Coast votes, Orlando Sentinel "The Obama campaign immediately seized on what it said was a change in McCain's space stance. "One day it's a spending freeze; the next day it's not; but whatever his stance is, Space Coast voters are looking for a change from the Bush-McCain policies that brought us to the brink of thousands of job losses," Obama spokeswoman Adrianne Marsh said." October 17, 2008Nelson Vs McCain Over NASA
"Sen. Nelson: Well, as we speak, John McCain has left Miami and he's en route to my home town of Melbourne. And the fact that he's going to Brevard County is an indication that he is quite concerned that Barack has really sliced in to that traditionally Republican area, because Barack has a very detailed proposal on America's space program, and John McCain has had a proposal, as he said two nights ago in the debate, of a freeze at last year's levels across the board. And, of course, if they do that with NASA, it will absolutely continue to savage NASA, as George Bush's administration has done, that's leading us at the space center, when they shut down the space shuttle, to 4,000 to 5,000 jobs laying off because they have not developed the new rocket to replace the space shuttle, and we're going to be beholden to the Russians to get to the very space station that we built and paid for, and -- and -- and without an American vehicle for five to six years. Barack has addressed this. And I submit to you that that's exactly why McCain is going to Brevard County, which went heavily for George Bush over John Kerry , and he's going in there because he knows that -- that Barack has -- has absolutely pierced those Republican engineers who are so concerned about America's space program." October 9, 2008Obama Releases Space-Themed TV Spot
"Barack Obama launched a new national television ad today that prominently features Apollo Astronauts as Obama recounts how they inspired his early days. In the 60-second ad entitled "Buster," Obama speaks directly to the camera about the lessons he learned from the early space program and what it taught him about America. The ad is the first by either presidential candidate to highlight the space program. Obama has pledged to increase NASA funding to save Florida jobs and maintain America's leadership in space. Senator McCain has pledged to freeze discretionary spending in his first year, which would negatively impact the space program." October 8, 2008Biden Mentions Space in FloridaBiden Discusses Economy, Obama During Local 6 Interview, local6.com "Number two, look what John wants to do with the space program. He wants to essentially put it on ice. I think it is clear, Florida is hurting." Just Say No To Overhead Projectors
Obama Announces FY08 Federal Funding Requests "Adler Planetarium, to support replacement of its projector and related equipment, $3,000,000 - One of its most popular attractions and teaching tools at the Adler Planetarium is the Sky Theater. The projection equipment in this theater is 40 years old, and is no longer supported with parts or service by the manufacturer. It has begun to fail, leaving the theater dark and groups of school students and other interested museum-goers without this very valuable and exciting learning experience." October 7, 2008Union Event at KSC"WEDNESDAY, October 8, engineers and other space industry workers will hold a press conference to denounce Senator John McCain's plan to freeze NASA spending and his Republican Party's attack on the space program. The Republicans' criticism of Senator Barack Obama's $2 billion plan to save space industry jobs comes as NASA Administrator and Republican appointee Dr. Michael Griffin thanked Senator Obama personally for his "leadership" in getting critical legislation passed to help maintain an American presence in space. Griffin wrote to Obama: "without your leadership, this would not have happened." Griffin to Obama: Without Your Leadership ...Obama Gets a Thank You from NASA, NY Times "NASA confirmed that Dr. Griffin sent the note, which first appeared on the website nasawatch.com, but added that he sent similar letters to other members of Congress. ... With the economy tipping precariously, was Dr. Griffin trying to ensure that at least one employee of the space agency would remain in his job in January? It does not sound like the Griffin style, frankly -- he is an engineer, not a Washington schmoozer, and when asked to describe his feelings early in his tenure, replied, ""I don't do feelings. Just think of me as Spock" Click on image to enlarge October 6, 2008McCain Vs RNC on NASA Funding
"Obama Has Proposed $2 Billion In Additional NASA Funding. "Sen. Barack Obama has detailed a comprehensive space plan that includes $2 billion in new funding to reinvigorate NASA and a promise to make space exploration and science a significantly higher priority if he is elected president." (Marc Kaufman, "Obama Suggests $2 Billion In New Funding For NASA," The Washington Post, 8/19/08)" John McCain: America's Space Program "As President, John McCain will - Ensure that space exploration is top priority and that the U.S. remains a leader; - Commit to funding the NASA Constellation program to ensure it has the resources it needs to begin a new era of human space exploration. - Review and explore all options to ensure U.S. access to space by minimizing the gap between the termination of the Space Shuttle and the availability of its replacement vehicle; ..."
I am not certain how McCain can accomplish what he has proposed - which seems to be more or less what Obama has proposed - unless he either increases NASA's budget or cuts something rather dramatically to pay for what he wants to see NASA do. That said, McCain does have a strong stance in support of NASA. As such, the RNC snipe at Obama for holding a similar stance to McCain's is curious. Perhaps the RNC did not check with the McCain folks ... Nelson hits RNC on NASA stance, Orlando Sentinel "Democratic U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida said the Republican National Committee "just stepped in it" when they blasted Barack Obama for his promise to give NASA $2 billion more in funding. "It's not only ridiculous, it shows how totally out of it they are," said Nelson, who said extra NASA funding helps grow jobs in Florida, home to the Kennedy Space Center and a key swing state in the upcoming presidential election. "They simply don't know what they are talking about." Washington Examiner Space Blogger Goes The Nazi Route
October 5, 2008Obama on World Space Week
"Senator Barack Obama issued the following statement today on World Space Week and the 50th Anniversary of the inception of NASA: "This week, we join more than 50 nations around the world in celebrating World Space Week. And this year, as we mark the 50th anniversary of NASA, our space program is at a crossroads. As other countries are moving forward in space, my opponent's vision would cause us to fall unacceptably behind. His pledge to freeze all discretionary spending for programs other than veterans and defense would assure the loss of thousands of jobs in Florida, and seriously threaten America's leadership in space. I have a different vision. My plan to revitalize our space program will reduce the gap between the Space Shuttle's retirement and its next-generation replacement; and we'll increase funding for a robust human space exploration program and research that pushes the very boundaries of discovery." President Clinton Reinforces Senator Obama's Plans to Preserve and Reinvigorate Space Program, earlier post October 1, 2008Clinton on Obama's Space Policy
"ORLANDO - TODAY, speaking in Orlando and Fort Pierce, President Bill Clinton spoke to Floridians about reasons a Barack Obama and Joe Biden administration would benefit Americans. The former President strongly supported Obama's policies on the economy, energy independence and health care. Possibly the most salient of issues for Floridians was the former President's support of Barack Obama's vision for a robust space program. "He has a plan to support the space industry, which I think is important not just to Florida but to America. This is a very big deal," said Clinton during his speech in Orlando. "We have a vested interest in staying on the frontiers of technological change and many of the answers to our environmental and other challenges will be found by continuing the push into space." September 24, 2008The Election, Space, Logic, and Choices
"Silly me. When I embarked on this freelance journalism project to chase down strings of rationality in the race for the U.S. presidency, using the space program as my fishing reel, I made a bad assumption. I thought rationality MATTERED to all people. You know? Fact-gathering, logical reasoning, analysis, verification … the processes of science? Please stop chuckling. I know I should have known better. So forget about the LOGICAL thing to do for NASA, let alone the country. I've realized what counts most in our society is a good story. We love drama. If it was our gross domestic product, we'd have so much money Sarah Palin would be writing us checks from the Treasury, just like they do with oil revenue in Alaska." September 18, 2008Yet Another Secret Space Discussion
"The meeting is closed, definitely closed, and that is not going to change," said Alexis Allen, a spokeswoman for Aerospace Industries Association, a trade industry group. "I think there has been a lot of public debate and not every forum has to be a public event."
September 17, 2008Getting Science Right In The Next Administration
September 15, 2008McCain and Obama on Science
"Entering the debate on several contentious science issues, John McCain today answered the "14 top science questions facing America," according to ScienceDebate2008.com, the group leading an effort to make science issues a larger part of the election. His answers join those of Barack Obama, who answered the same questions two weeks ago. Recent national polls have shown that 85% of voters would like the see the candidates debate these challenges, and the majority of voters are much more likely to vote for a candidate that has a plan for tackling these issues." August 29, 2008President of Free Space
"Rational thought, the foundation of science, the reason why there are rovers scratching the sand on Mars today, has been largely absent from the American political scene, and perhaps the American way of life for a long time now. Institutions created to solve specific problems, became incarnated (think FDR's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society) and never went away. That's what NASA is fighting now. Its leaders know the agency needs to dematerialize, shed its expensive and deadly shuttle program, and return to its core roots of space exploration."
Alas, despite Obama's grandfather's statement, it is apparently going to take longer for NASA to send humans back to the Moon than it did the first time - and the rocket science seems to be harder this time than it was the first time around. August 26, 2008McCain, Vitter, and Hutchison Want To Consider Shuttle Flights Past 2010
"Sen. John McCain -- joined by Republican colleagues Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas and David Vitter of New Orleans -- sent a letter to President Bush this week, saying that in light of tensions with Russia, the White House should tell NASA to stop any further dismantling of the shuttle infrastructure for at least a year to keep open the possibility of more shuttle flights beyond 2010." August 19, 2008Campaign Update
Obama Suggests $2 Billion In New Funding for NASA, Washington post "Sen. Barack Obama has detailed a comprehensive space plan that includes $2 billion in new funding to reinvigorate NASA and a promise to make space exploration and science a significantly higher priority if he is elected president. Campaigning in Florida yesterday, Sen. John McCain responded by telling business leaders that Obama has changed his position on some key questions of NASA funding in recent months and should not be trusted to support the program." August 18, 2008McCain Shoots Back at Obama on Space
"I know that earlier this year, Senator Obama proposed cutting the NASA budget and delaying the timetable for our return to the Moon and the Mars mission," McCain said. "I believe that he later repudiated his own plan. Sometimes it is difficult to know what a politician will actually do once in office, because they say different things at different times to different people. This is a particular problem when a candidate has a short, thin record on the issues as in the case of Senator Obama." McCain says he's the one to keep US in space, Reuters "On a visit to Florida's Space Coast, home to the NASA complex at Cape Canaveral, the Arizona Republican said as U.S. president, he would make space exploration a top priority and ensure that the United States retains its leadership role." Barack Obama: Advancing the Frontiers of Space Exploration Florida Dems Rip McCain's Space Record
"While John McCain is visiting Titusville today, holding a closed door meeting to talk about NASA issues, the Florida Democratic Party thought Floridians might appreciate some Straight Talk about John McCain's failed record on space issues. "How can the Space Coast trust John McCain when he has failed us so many other times? In the Senate, Chairman McCain was the one man that could have stood up to prevent the space flight gap and save thousands of Space Coast jobs, however, as is the case with so many other issues, McCain instead stood with President Bush. And to add insult to injury, McCain fought against NASA funding calling it pork barrel spending," said Eric Jotkoff, Florida Democratic Party spokesman." McCain Space Policy Paper, earlier post August 17, 2008Obama Pledges to Find $2 billion for NASA
"But until Sunday, the democratic policy, while clearly ambitious, was lacking in details of how much an Obama administration would give to NASA, and where the funds to try to speed up development of a successor rocket to the space shuttle were going to come from. According to Nelson, the Obama campaign has pledged to find $2 billion for NASA by clawing back pork barrel earmarks, such as, Nelson said, "a highway in Alaska to nowhere." Evolving Obama now supports $2 billion more for NASA, Houston Chronicle "The most important change in Obama's past positions is that he now favors at least one additional space shuttle mission before it is retired. Nelson said Obama's staff assured him that the presidential candidate now favors the congressional plan to add $2 billion to NASA's budget." Barack Obama: Advancing the Frontiers of Space Exploration Space Policy: More From McCain This Week?
"... These details are included in a seven-page policy statement the campaign is expected to formally release today. John McCain has previously said he supports the moon-and-Mars exploration strategy, and that he, too, will work to minimize the number of years in which NASA has no way to send astronauts into space." Obama: Let's go to moon, and maybe Mars, Orlando Sentinel "The policy puts new pressure on McCain ahead of his private meeting with space-industry leaders. McCain's low-key visit to the Space Coast comes more than two weeks after Obama held a town-hall meeting in Titusville where he pledged his support to a robust space policy and said he would no longer seek to raid NASA's budget to support his education-reform plans. McCain, on the other hand, has been quiet about his space policy beyond endorsing sending Americans to the moon. He recently released his own enhanced position on the issue on his Web site without any fanfare." McCain Space Policy Paper, earlier post Obama Position Paper on Space Exploration
"When I was growing up, NASA united Americans to a common purpose and inspired the world with accomplishments we are still proud of. Today, NASA is an organization that impacts many facets of American life. I believe NASA needs an inspirational vision for the 21st Century. My vision will build on the great goals set forth in recent years, to maintain a robust program of human space exploration and ensure the fulfillment of NASA's mission. Together, we can ensure that NASA again reflects all that is best about our country and continue our nation's preeminence in space." ... ... "Human spaceflight is important to America's political, economic, technological, and scientific leadership. Barack Obama will support renewed human exploration beyond low earth orbit. He endorses the goal of sending human missions to the Moon by 2020, as a precursor in an orderly progression to missions to more distant destinations, including Mars." McCain Space Policy Paper, earlier post August 15, 2008Election Debate on Space
"There was a sharp contrast between Garver and Cunningham. Garver has been working space policy issues for a long time, and recently has been working with the Obama campaign (she noted that she has had the opportunity to talk with Obama several times, including recently). Cunningham, on the other hand, does not appear to have an active role in the McCain campaign, at least on space issues; he mentioned that after he was invited to participate he had to read up on what both campaigns had said on the issue. Or, as he put it, "I don't talk to the senator. He calls me." This made it difficult at times to separate what Cunningham was saying on behalf of the campaign and what were his own opinions." August 12, 2008McCain Space Policy Paper
"Current U.S. space operations policy commits the U.S. to completing the International Space Station (ISS) by 2010 and then terminating the Space Shuttle flights, with the completion of the ISS. The NASA vision for space exploration calls for sending a robotic lunar lander to the Moon in 2008/2009 time period to begin searching for potential base sites and for development and deployment of a new manned space craft for lunar missions. The current policy also calls for new vehicles (referred to as the Orion crew vehicle and the Ares launch vehicle) to be ready for Earth orbit by 2015 and lunar landing by 2020 with an eventual mission to Mars. As President, John McCain will ... "
August 7, 2008Imaginary Party Splits and Bad Facts at the Washington Examiner
"And some people, like Sen. Barack Obama, find the religion in space exploration when it's late in the campaign season, criticisms over his anti-space views are flying, and rumors of a Democratic party split over space are gaining velocity." Space a Potential Fracture Line at Democratic National Convention?, Washington Examiner "On the other hand, there's the presumptive nominee, Sen. Barack Obama, who's widely regarded as anti-space, despite this weeks's Google spin."
Oh yes, Patricia Phillips, who openly touts her NASA credentials, seems to be totally ignorant of a few historic facts as they relate to space exploration. NACA was the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics. NACA became NASA in 1958. But Obama is not talking about NACA. If Phillips had taken the time to carefully read or listen to what Obama said, she'd have seen that he was talking about bringing back "the National Aeronautics and Space Council". The Space Council, an advisory body operated by the White House and chaired by the Vice President is not - nor has it ever been - the same thing as NACA. Do a little more research before you dump on people in the future, Patricia.
P.S. She also thinks a company named "McDonnell-Douglas" still exists. August 2, 2008Florida Democrats Rip McCain on Space
"Once again, John McCain and his campaign have decided to take the low road rather than defend his own record on NASA issues, which Florida Today called "downright schizophrenic." Not only has McCain voted to take funding from NASA to fund other priorities, but his "fantasy" plan to pay for making the Bush's tax cuts permanent by freezing discretionary funding and vetoing every bill with earmarks would cost the Mars mission millions. Here are the facts on John McCain's record on NASA funding:" Obama Reverses Campaign Stance on Constellation Cuts
"This is an administration that is anti-science. They have rejected science - I want us to be a science-based society."
Obama says he will protect NASA jobs, budget, Orlando Sentinel "That position had been "reported" on Obama's official campaign Web site until it was removed Saturday. The campaign of Republican rival John McCain was quick to point that out, declaring in a news release, "Barack Obama once again demonstrated that his words really don't matter."
"Barack was in Titusville, Florida this morning for a "Working for Change" town hall. Along with the economy, Barack talked about the need to focus on space exploration and the effect it has on Florida residents. He said..." "And we have to do more than provide short-term relief. We have to secure our long-term prosperity and strengthen America's competitiveness in the 21st century. One of the areas where we are in danger of losing our competitive edge is our space program. When I was growing up, NASA inspired the world with achievements we are still proud of. Today, we have an administration that has set ambitious goals for NASA without giving NASA the support it needs to reach them. As a result, they've had to cut back on research, and trim their programs, which means that after the Space Shuttle shuts down in 2010, we're going to have to rely on Russian spacecraft to keep us in orbit. We cannot cede our leadership in space. That's why I will help close the gap and ensure that our space program doesn't suffer when the Shuttle goes out of service by working with Senator Bill Nelson to add at least one additional Space Shuttle flight beyond 2010; by supporting continued funding for NASA; by speeding the development of the Shuttle's successor; and by making sure that all those who work in the space industry in Florida do not lose their jobs when the Shuttle is retired - because we cannot afford to lose their expertise. More broadly, we need a real vision for space exploration. To help formulate this vision, I'll reestablish the National Aeronautics and Space Council so that we can develop a plan to explore the solar system - a plan that involves both human and robotic missions, and enlists both international partners and the private sector. And as America leads the world to long-term exploration of the moon, Mars, and beyond, let's also tap NASA's ingenuity to build the airplanes of tomorrow and to study our own planet so we can combat global climate change. Under my watch, NASA will inspire the world, make America stronger, and help grow the economy here in Florida."
July 30, 2008The Candidates on NASA and Space Exploration
"In recent years, Washington has failed to give NASA a robust, balanced and adequately funded mission. Though the good people of NASA who work day in and day out on new frontiers are doing amazing things, Americans are no longer inspired as they once were. That's a failure of leadership. "I believe we need to revitalize NASA's mission to maintain America's leadership, and recommit our nation to the space program, and as President I intend to do just that. We must revive the American ingenuity that led millions of children look to NASA astronauts and scientists as role models and enter the fields of math, engineering and science. Our leadership in the world depends on it." Statement by John McCain on the 50th Anniversary of NASA "While my opponent seems content to retreat from American exploration of space for a decade, I am not. As President, I will act to ensure our astronauts will continue to explore space, and not just by hitching a ride with someone else. I intend to make sure that the NASA Constellation program ha s the resources it needs so that we can begin a new era of human space exploration. A country that sent a man to the moon should expect no less." July 28, 2008Obama on Space (Update)
"Obama has said that his education proposals would cost about $18 billion and would be funded by trimming NASA's budget and auctioning surplus federal properties, among other measures. But most of the Illinois senator's education proposals are so costly that they would require Congress to approve additional new spending. He says he wants to make "a historic commitment" to education, because he wants to give every American child the same chances he had." Looking at Mars - McCain is onboard for Bush's space mission; Obama may be more down to earth, opinion, LA Times "Fiscal realities and NASA's commitment to keeping its $17-billion budget flat already seem to be putting a limit on Constellation, but Bush's, and now McCain's, vision nicely balances realism and ambition. Yet it's Obama who is sounding like the more realistic, market-oriented candidate. His campaign said recently that Obama hopes to enhance NASA's role "in confronting the challenges we face here on Earth, including global climate change" and "to reach out and include international partners and engage the private sector to increase NASA's reach and provide real public economic benefits for the nation." July 13, 2008Put Space In The Republican and Democratic Platforms
So, sign up for an an account, login, and start telling them what you think about space. Let's see if the DNC offers a similar service - we'll certainly link to it if they do.
July 8, 2008Toward A Progressive Space Policy
"NASA is in crisis--overburdened, under-funded and inefficient. Yet the progressive legacy of space, which dates back to JFK, is being quietly reborn: NASA can reinvent itself as a critical resource in climate change mitigation; the UN and some in the U.S. military are collaborating to prevent space weapons from becoming an arms race with China; and progressive "NewSpace" entrepreneurs are creating new domestic high-tech jobs. Before 2009, a new progressive space policy needs to be devised and advocated beyond the traditional space constituencies, to upgrade Bush's failing space exploration vision. Who better to initiate this work than the Netroots?" July 2, 2008Science Questions For The Candidates"On behalf of the American science and innovation community (see who here), we have submitted these questions to the candidates for President and asked them to do two simple things: A) provide a written response, which we will publish here, and B) discuss these questions in a nationally televised forum. ... 11. Space. The study of earth from space can yield important information about climate change; focus on the cosmos can advance our understanding of the universe; and manned space travel can help us inspire new generations of youth to go into science. Can we afford all of them? How would you prioritize space in your administration?" AvWeek on Election 2008
"In nine articles, AW&ST explores topics that need attention on Day 1, such as education, R&D, export controls and NASA funding, as well as looming pressures to trim defense, despite engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan. The issue examines the role that Florida will play in the election, and discusses the impact the candidates' position on the future of the space program will have on the economy of the state's "space coast." June 22, 2008Will The KSC Workforce Show Up - And Be Heard? Will It Matter?
What: Link to Launch: Floridians will gather, link their hands and countdown from 30 seconds when they will lift them skyward in a gesture to show solidarity and awareness of the importance of the Space Program to America. The rally is scheduled to coincide with a Senate subcommittee hearing being held inside the Port Authority Offices. The Link to Launch movement was started by people in on Florida's Space Coast to raise the awareness of the nation and our policy makers that Space is a critical element in our nation's security, our culture and global economic competitiveness. A limited number of media seats on helicopters are available for aerial photography. When: Monday, June 23 June 20, 2008Skipping Over Bush on Space
"President Bush "strongly opposes" the measure -- saying it costs too much -- but its backers said the bill isn't meant for him. It's intended to show presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama that NASA has support in Congress. "We're really on to the next administration at this point. That's 99 percent of our focus," said U.S. Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Oviedo, one of the bill's sponsors. "By an overwhelming, enthusiastic and bipartisan majority, the U.S. House has endorsed an aggressive promotion of NASA in general and human spaceflight in particular." June 6, 2008McCain Speaks About Humans To Mars
"Yes, I'd be willing to spend more taxpayers dollars,'' McCain said, adding he thought Americans respond to setting goals for specific projects. McCain said ever since reading Ray Bradbury's Martian Chronicles, "I'm intrigued by a man on Mars. I think it would excite the imagination of the American people . . . Americans would be very willing to do that.'' Video Of McCain's comments (scroll down a bit) June 4, 2008Cramer Pings Obama on SpaceU.S. Rep. Bud Cramer still hasn't chosen Obama or Clinton, Birmingham News "Cramer said Obama had positions about space exploration and how far along the space agency was in funding a return trip to the Moon and on to Mars. He said Obama made it clear that the exploration program was not just a signature of the Bush Administration, but one that many congressmen had wanted for years. "I wanted them to look at the issues more thoroughly ... I just got a commitment that they would," he said." June 3, 2008We Get The Space Program We (Don't) Ask ForSpace exploration on the cheap: America misses its moment, The Hill "... All achieved by the clear vision laid out by President Kennedy when he told the nation that our goal was to be on the moon by the end of the 1960s. By comparison, today's lack of political leadership when it comes to space exploration is embarrassing. Don't get me wrong. This is not a Republican or a Democratic matter. And politicians are not the only ones to blame. We the people, who have not exactly demanded excellence from our government over the past few decades, share a big part of the blame as well. Maybe even most of the blame." June 2, 2008Space Politics at ISDC
"Those interested in space policy this election year have suffered from conflicting feelings. On the one hand, there have been plenty of opportunities for the candidates to speak about space issues, more so than in a typical election cycle, due perhaps to the length or intensity of the campaign. From formal policy statements to questions posed at town hall meetings, all three of the major remaining candidates--Senators Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Barack Obama--have had multiple opportunities to talk about how they would handle various space-related issues as president." May 31, 2008Space Politics at ISDCThe so-so space debate: initial impressions, Space politics "Half of the four people on the panel were able to talk about space policy quite well: Lori Garver, representing Clinton, was well-versed in the issues, not surprising; O’Brien has also done his homework, based on the questions he asked on topics beyond NASA’s budget and the future of the vision, ranging from commercialization to military space policy to export control." May 30, 2008ISDC on CSPAN Today
Excerpt of Sen. Obama's representative's (Steve Robinson) comments on space policy: Sen. Obama views space policy within a larger framework of science in general. Sen. Obama is a friend of science and engineering. We need more input from scientists and engineers in decisions that affect research in these areas. General principles: 1. We need to build/support a strong pool of talented people to ensure the future of space research and to ensure a supply engineers of tomorrow. Inspiration takes many forms. My boss has not talked about space - and when he does he will talk about it in an inspirational way. 2. We need to create a supportive environment for research and development in both the public and private sector - including support for a a new generation of entrepreneurs. 3. Need to apply science, technology, and engineering to solve the world's greatest challenges. 4. Need to be linking human and robotic exploration of space more clearly to challenges that face our planet such as climate change and to provide unadulterated scientific advice to the government. Steve Robinson suggested that there are other things that are done by robots in space that can be inspiring and that humans do not necessarily need to be there (although e personally find that inspiring). Moderator Miles O'Brien suggested that there are "no high schools named after robots". Robinson replied "some of those high schools are building robots". He elaborated that it might be more inspiring for his students (he's a teacher) to create ways to interact with rovers on Mars. "We should not limit our inspiration to what inspires us. I am not inspired by Second Life but others are." May 24, 2008Progressive Space
"I'm very pleased to announce that for the first time, The Netroots Nation (Yearly Kos) Convention will feature a panel on space policy, July 18th or 19th in Austin, Texas. The panel, entitled, "Progressive NASA & Space Policy Under a New Administration," is an opportunity to bring critical space policy issues to light within a potent progressive political constituency- the Netroots- that hasn't historically paid much attention to space. It is also an opportunity for the Netroots to weigh in on what a new progressive space policy agenda could be under a progressive Administration in 2009." May 23, 2008Election 2008: Obama Talks (A Little) About NASA
"Now I know we're transitioning from the shuttle to the Orion program and I am fully committed to making sure that is funded. But I want to review with NASA what are we doing in terms of manned flights to the moon or to Mars vs. are we better off using things like Hubble that yields us more information and better bang for the buck. The bottom line is I am absolute committed to making sure we have a space program that is second to none in the world. That's my absolute commitment. But I want to sit down with NASA and figure out what's our focus and make sure that that focus is clear and yielding the kind of benefits over time. I want us to understand what it is we're trying to accomplish." Education Position paper, Obama for President (NASA excerpt toward the bottom) "IX. A COMMITMENT TO FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY Barack Obama's early education and K-12 plan package costs about $18 billion per year. He will maintain fiscal responsibility and prevent any increase in the deficit by offsetting cuts and revenue sources in other parts of the government. The early education plan will be paid for by delaying the NASA Constellation Program for five years, using purchase cards and the negotiating power of the government to reduce costs of standardized procurement, auctioning surplus federal property, and reducing the erroneous payments identified by the Government Accountability Office, and closing the CEO pay deductibility loophole. The rest of the plan will be funded using a small portion of the savings associated with fighting the war in Iraq." May 6, 2008Space and Election 2008Candidates' space ideas lack launch pad, NPR Marketplace "One thing the presidential candidates haven't been talking about is a space policy. Jeremy Hobson takes a look at whether the candidates have any plans for the final frontier." April 29, 2008Nelson Urges Voters To Push Space Issue
"Nelson said that Floridians need to press their case on the presidential candidates, Republican John McCain and Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton was the first candidate to outline support for "robust human spaceflight" and is seen as NASA's biggest booster of the three. But there are questions on how committed she is to the Bush administration's plans for exploration to the moon and then Mars." April 26, 2008Today's Video: CNN on Space and the Candidates
"What do the candidates say? John McCain speaks favorably for continuing the current course for space exploration, but he also wants to control spending, and that could further disrupt funding. Hillary Clinton has ambitious plans including quote: "Robust human space flight." Her emphasis appears to be on astronauts looking back, studying our own planet to combat global warming. And Barack Obama has suggested that while work in space is important and should continue, it's no longer inspirational, and NASA needs to reconsider its goals. Unlike President John Kennedy who launched the moon missions, not one of them is saying much about returning to the moon, and they rarely mention Mars." April 25, 2008Clinton Seeks to Save Arecibo
"In a release issued by her Senate office, Clinton highlighted that Cornell University is a New York institution. She stressed the "historic relationship" between that state and Puerto Rico. "Cornell University scientists have used the remarkable tools available at Arecibo Observatory to greatly expand our understanding of the universe," Clinton said in the release. "I am proud to support the path-blazing accomplishments of these New Yorkers." Clinton Introduces Legislation to Support Cornell's Innovative Observatory in Puerto Rico IFPTE Endorses Obama
"The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers' (IFPTE), an AFL-CIO affiliated labor union whose public, private and federal sector membership includes engineers, scientists and technicians at the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Energy (DOE), NASA and Boeing, has given their backing to Senator Barack Obama for President of the United States. The IFPTE Executive Council voted without opposition late yesterday to endorse the Illinois Senator." Obama's response: " ... I'll fight for organized labor by protecting the right to organize. I'll support vigorous reinvestment in our federal research and development agencies, including NASA, to maintain America's leadership in Science and Technology and to foster economic competitiveness." April 23, 2008NASA Under Obama?Obama's Plan for NASA, American Thinker "As the legend goes, when the Spanish conquistador Hernando Cortez landed in what is now Mexico in 1519, he ordered the boats that brought him and his men there to be burned. Obama seems to have something similar planned for NASA." April 17, 2008Who's Worse For NASA: Democrats or Republicans?
Let's look at this a little more closely. Yes, Sen. Obama (D-IL) has indeed talked of drastic and unwarranted cuts to Project Constellation - and has said rather negative things about human spaceflight. But that's about the only specificity we've heard from him. By stark contrast, Sen. Clinton (D-NY) seems to be outright supportive of NASA. Yet it is Sen. McCain (R-AZ) who has proposed a freeze on discretionary spending (which includes NASA's budget) which would amount to a cut (or non-growth) at a time when a number of NASA projects are depending upon budget increases. And this would be set against a backdrop whereby the Bush Administration won't lift a finger to prepare a budget for FY 2010 - leaving the incoming Administration to scramble to cobble one together between November 2008 and January 2009. This comes after the Bush administration walked away from the earlier financial commitments it had made for the implementation of the VSE. If anything, in 2008, with the politics in play - and the history of the past few years before us, the Republicans seem more intent upon depriving NASA of needed budget funds - and have a proven track record of doing so. Then again, only time will tell what will actually happen. Why Are The Candidates Afraid To Talk About Science?
"Tomorrow Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain should have been going toe-to-toe in a televised science debate. All three were invited by a bipartisan group of Nobel laureates and other scholars called ScienceDebate 2008 to step on stage at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia and explain how they will ensure that America continues to dominate the sciences. Leading in scientific research and advancement is an essential element to our future prosperity, health and national defense. All three candidates declined. Apparently the top contenders for our nation's highest elective office have better things to do than explain to the public their views on securing America's future." April 15, 2008Election 2008: Freezing NASA
"The plan is centered around a one-year freeze in discretionary spending -- with the exception of military and veterans programs -- to allow for a "top-to-bottom review of the effectiveness of federal programs." "'Discretionary spending' is a term people throw around a lot in Washington, while actual discretion is seldom exercised," McCain said. "Instead, every program comes with a built-in assumption that it should go on forever, and its budget increase forever. My administration will change that way of thinking."
Run Nick RunTexan's campaign champions NASA, gives slim hope for Kennedy Space Center job, Orlando Sentinel "A Texas congressman trying to keep his job could be the best hope for Kennedy Space Center workers trying to keep theirs. But it's a slim hope at best. Meet U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson, a Democrat defending a Houston-area seat once held by former Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Like DeLay, Lampson is an avid NASA supporter with strong ties to nearby Johnson Space Center." April 12, 2008Obama On Space Exploration (update)
"Tyler Monroe, a senior at MCHS, hopes the next president will support the endeavors of NASA. "I think it's really important that we further the exploration in space," he said. "Space is the next frontier." Transcript of questions and answers with Sen. Barack Obama, The Republic.com "Q: What do you plan to do with the space agency? Like right now they're currently underfunded, they, at first they didn't know if they were going to be able to operate Spirit rover. What do plan to do with it? Obama: I think that, I, uh. I grew up with the space program. Most of you young people here were born during the shuttle era. I was the Apollo era. I remember, you know, watching, you know, the moon landing. I was living in Hawaii when I was growing up, so the astronauts would actually, you know, land in the Pacific and then get brought into Honolulu and it was incredible memories and incredibly inspiring. And by the way inspired a whole generation of people to get engaged in math and science in a way that we haven't - that we need to renew. So I'm a big supporter of the space program. I think it needs to be redefined, though. We've kind of lost a sense of mission in terms of what it is that NASA should be trying to achieve and I think that we've gotta make some big decisions about whether or not, are we going to try to send manned, you know, space launches, or are we better off in terms of what we're learning sending unmanned probes which oftentimes are cheaper and less dangerous, but yield more information. And that's a major debate I'm going to want to convene when I'm president of the United States. What direction do we take the space program in? Once we have a sense of what's going to be most valuable for us in terms of gaining knowledge, then I think we'll able to adjust the budget so that we're going all out on what it is that we've decided to do." April 9, 2008Elections and BudgetsElection year delay for NASA's Ares and Orion vehicles feared, Flight Global "The USA's presidential election could leave NASA short of the funding it needs to keep its Orion crew exploration vehicle and Ares I booster project on track for their planned maiden flight in March 2015."
April 1, 2008VSE: No Bucks - No Buck Rogers
"NASA stresses that its strategy is to "go as we can afford to pay," with the pace of the program set, in part, by the available funding. In 2004, the President proposed adding a total of $1 billion to NASA's budget for FY2005 through FY2009 to help pay for the Vision, but subsequent Administration budgets more than eliminated this proposed increase, and actual appropriations by Congress have been even less. Most funding for the Vision is thus being redirected from other NASA activities. To free up funding for Orion and Ares I, the space shuttle program will be terminated in 2010, and U.S. use of the ISS will end by 2017. NASA has not provided a cost estimate for the Vision as a whole. Its 2005 implementation plan estimates that returning astronauts to the Moon will cost $104 billion, not including the cost of robotic precursor missions, and that using Orion to service the ISS will cost an additional $20 billion. A report by the Government Accountability Office gives a total cost for the Vision of $230 billion over two decades." March 23, 2008Taking Obama To Task On SpaceNo place for partisans on NASA, space exploration, editorial, Houston Chronicle "Because of the 2008 presidential election, our nation's human spaceflight program is at a perilous crossroad. While Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain all have made allusions to supporting the program, none has made it a priority. In fact, in late 2007 Obama went on record as saying he planned to pay for his $18 billion education plan by taking it out of the hide of NASA. In defending his desire to delay the Orion and Ares programs (the next generation crew spacecraft and rockets), he stressed, "We're not going to have the engineers and scientists to continue space exploration if we don't have kids who are able to read, write and compute." March 10, 2008Election 2008 Update 10 March 2008: This Does Not Sound Hopeful
"During the question-and-answer portion of an event at a recreational center here, Obama was asked about the nation's space program. "I grew up on Star Trek," Obama said. "I believe in the final frontier." But Obama said he does not agree with the way the space program is now being run and thinks funding should be trimmed until the mission is clearer. "NASA has lost focus and is no longer associated with inspiration," he said. "I don't think our kids are watching the space shuttle launches. It used to be a remarkable thing. It doesn't even pass for news anymore." Do you have a comment? (please limit them to space policy and/or Obama's comments about space) Send them to nasawatch@spaceref.com. Your comments thus far: Typical Obama. Says he grew up on Star Trek and the final frontier, but I guess he expects that to just happen for the human race without any effort or investment. The election of this guy spells disaster for NASA (and the country), at least the human spaceflight portion. The science folks will get their wish though, elimination of that costly and unproductive human spaceflight thing that sucks up all the money. I cannot believe that anyone could fall for the BS that this guys spews on a daily basis. He is the epitome of an "empty suit". Flashy, but no substance. As for jackasses, NASA has plenty, but they tend to pool into middle and upper management. For every one of these idiots (and they're not all idiots, just an alarmingly increasing number), there are 20 hard-working, caring, intelligent, and energetic space enthusiasts that make this community of people something the country and the human race can be proud of. Anyone who says otherwise is bitter or ignorant. I put up with the jerks every day in my position and I often think they will ruin the place. But then I do something positive with some of the most excellent people you could ever meet, and my hope is restored. It is a roller coaster, but the thrill and excitement far outweighs the down side. It's too bad that ostriches like Obama will never know this because his head is buried in the sand. The rant about there being "Far too many jackasses within NASA" reads like the writer's got a personal vendetta - it's not an observation about Obama's space policy (or lack thereof). I only wish the public could see the NASA people that I work with. They are professional, energetic, sharp, and real team players. I don't know anyone matching the description given. So, I guess I haven't met the writer, yet. I guess one question I would have is how has Obama voted with respect to the NASA budget. Specifically, wasn't there a vote to endorse the VSE in 2005? How did he vote (if there was one)? Keith, I have agree with Obama. There are far too many jackasses within NASA and the contractor community. There are far too many politicians masquerading as engineers. And far too many managers that only wish to build an empire for their own career and just waste tax dollars in the process. If NASA was a computer I would suggest reformatting the hard drive. There needs to be a massive RIF to eliminate the politicians, megalomaniacs and 'fanboys'. We need only keep those that want to work together to expand humanity's presence and knowledge. But there are too many people with an different agenda in agency that are in the way and they know who they are and they need to just go away. Signed, A JSC employee The distinguished junior Senator from Illinois is being poorly advised by folks who know little of Space, and less about his interests in presidential politics, to the detriment of both. Should we abandon healthcare or defense until we figure out how to do it right? And who decides what is right? Much more importantly, space can and should be good presidential politics. By challenging the existing program for human space flight he puts thousand of families at risk in Florida and Ohio. He's running for President, damn it! Is there no one on his staff that understands ticking off thousands of families in Florida and Ohio is not good electoral college math? This is not a plan for change, its a plan for the "same old thing", another Democratic loss. Space politics, if played well, will use presidential politics to obtain the needed funding from the administration and Congress to allow NASA to execute its mission as it should. It is clear the only one who 'gets it' is Hillary. Bring the race to Florida again so we can draw Senator Obama a more clear picture. Regarding a diversion of NASA funds for pre-school education, I just checked the F7-09 budget allocation for the Dept. of Education: $59B! That's equivalent to half the cost of the entire ISS project, or about 30 shuttle launches in one year! Dear Mr. Obama, why isn't $59B enough? This is the most frustrating candidate I have ever seen. Every time he opens his mouth on the issue he tries to put a new spin on Space to try to appease some voters, however the bottom line never changes - he plans the systematic cancellation of US manned space efforts. He does not realize or care that this will effectively kill thousands of high tech jobs (perfect timing as the US heads into a recession). Forget about a delay of 5 years as people are not just going to sit around waiting for the manned space effort to pick up again. They will need to find jobs somewhere to support their families and for a second time in the past 40 years the ability to do great things in space will have been sacrificed and lost. This is just like when Apollo was cancelled. The ability to go to the moon was lost and still is as can be demonstrated by the VSE trying to formulate a new return to the moon. They have to relearn almost everything again (talk about a wasted effort and wasted resources). And to top this off in my mind is the story on CNN today that projected the cost of the war in Iraq at $12 billion dollars per MONTH!... So every month and a half that goes by they spend more money in Iraq for What exactly - which equates to the YEARLY budget at NASA. Absolutely unbelievable to me. This man is dangerous and short sighted to the point that if he gets his way, we can all forget about the manned space flight dream for the rest of our lifetimes. The next voice you hear from the Moon or Mars will require a translator for the US news media as it won't be done in English! NASA has done such a great job with the money we've given them in the past, like with the "international" (don't say freedom) space station, so let's give them more money? What kind of idiot do you have to be to think that? When they can figure out a way to do a decent job with a little money THEN give them more. Anyone who is stupid enough to throw good money after bad deserves the screwing that NASA gives us on a regular basis. Would you go back to a barber and after they gave you a horrible haircut go back later and pay them twice as much figuring that a more expensive haircut would be better? Seriously, who is stupid enough to think like that? I think that Obama is not trying to argue that we should abandon space science, space research, and space technology. He is trying to convince us that more thought is necessary before committing the taxpayer's money. Maintaining a human presence in space should never be an end in itself. By far, the most important thing is what we do once we get there. My own preference is to set aside the "Vision" in its present form, and use the funding for an aggressive program of space station utilization. I would like to see us create an International Space Station Science Institute, located at a University, following the model of the Space Telescope Science Institute. With our international partners, we ought to do the "zero g" scientific research and investigations that the taxpayers expected, and continue to expect. We never know where the research will ultimately lead, and that is the most important reason for doing it! The technical, medical, and political benefits to humanity could be enormous -- well beyond anything that we can envision at this point in our evolution. Let us give history the opportunity to capture just how many major scientific, medical, biological, pharmaceutical, and microbiological discoveries were made in the "free-fall" environment of our space station. We might learn that one space station is not enough to accommodate the volume of proposed research, and that building and utilizing additional space stations might be in the best interest of humanity. Something for Obama (and the rest of us) to think about. I had heard about Obama's plan to delay the return to the moon plans for 5 years and use the money for pre-school education, and read his campaign statement about his position on spaceflight here on NASA Watch some time ago. Not long after, Caroline Kennedy came out with her official endorsement of Obama for President. She appeared in a commercial where she stated that her father had inspired the country to do great things, the next shot being an American NASA Astronaut with the US Flag on the moon. The end of the commercial had the standard "I'm Barack Obama, and I approved this message." JFK set the goal of the getting to the moon by the "end of the decade" deadline to reach the moon in May 1961. Five years later in May 1966 at the Kennedy Space Center, the VAB and Launch Complex 39 had been built and a test model Saturn V made its way from the VAB to Pad 39A. I don't think that Mr. Obama realizes that his approval of that commercial demonstrated that he is just another hypocritical candidate who really doesn't have the vision to lead the country. In the global economy that we live in, 5 years is an eternity - time the USA can't afford to waste. Mr. Obama continually states in his speeches that he wants to keep American jobs from going overseas, but his policy of postponing Orion/Altair for 5 years is a de facto outsourcing of human spaceflight (and NASA and Aerospace Industry jobs) to Russia, Japan, China and India. These countries either currently have or are in the process of getting probes into lunar orbit, and have stated that they are planning manned missions. Mr. Obama thinks that he can put the future on hold - and why I went out an made a specific effort to vote against him in the primary. This candidate's space policies are dangerous for the USA and the planet both near and short term. What really scares me is the fact that there may be a Clinton/Obama ticket - if Obama gets the Presidential nomination he can impose his foolish space policy, if he is the Vice-Presidential candidate he is no friend of NASA. Obama's Plan for Manned Space is to withold funding for the program until his Administration can come up with a replacement for VSE? And this will keep us out of orbit how much longer than the five years we now face? Furthermore, if my count is right, this is his third attempt at a Space plan. The first was to delay Orion & Constellation for 5 years,which would have put the date of the US re-entering manned Space at around 2020, all so he could divert Monet to his education initiatives. How's that for irony? The second version was to fund Orion at a level that would get us back into orbit around 2015, same as we have under Bush's current paltry funding, and delay Constellation ad infinitum. He's been fairly consistent in his dislike for funding manned Space exploration. In many ways, Senator Obama is Senator Mondale, but with more charisma and better tailored; that is, at least with respect to our manned program, voting for Obama is to vote to effectively kill the US manned program. That's change, alright, but not the sort of change I want brought to upon our nation. At least HRC wants to try to get the 2010-2015 gap between retiring the Shuttle and launching Orion down to 3-4 years. And McCain was the one whose Bill reorg'd NASA to get going on VSE--he has a strong Space record. Thanks for keeping us up to date here Keith. As far as manned space exploration is concerned, Barack Obama is the most dangerous Presidential candidate EVER: he is worse than Walter Mondale, William Proxmire and J. William Fulbright put together. Why? It's easy -- unlike those 3 gentlemen, who hated manned spaceflight and NASA in particular, Obama actually has a chance at getting elected. For those of you working in aerospace and the manned space program in particular -- Be afraid. Be VERY afraid... I would like to respond to this quote as well as the Obama space position in general: "Obama's space policy is confusing. He has said in the past he wants to cut NASA funding but also close the CEV/shuttle gap. He states that the funding he wants would be from delaying the moon/mars stuff. But, if you look at the exploration budget numbers, I don't think any real moon/mars stuff (Ares V, altair) really starts until what would be his second term." No, Obama's space policy is not confusing at all, it is only confusing to his supporters (or as I call them, apologists) who want to believe that once he gets some advice and talks to the right people, he will make good decisions concerning space exploration and NASA. This is complete rubbish. We have statement, after statement after statement from Senator Obama saying over and over again that NASA is a waste of money, "the space shuttle mission did not inspire the imagination of the public", he will delay the moon and Mars exploration by 5 years to pay for education - and on and on and on. I could repost them all here, but I am sure the majority of them are still available on NASA Watch. Here is one though: "We support replacing the shuttle and minimizing the gap. We also support delaying steps to take missions to the moon and Mars," Shapiro said. "One of the many ways we're paying for the education is delaying the mission to Mars." People who were heartened by his claim that he will narrow the gap between Shuttle and CEV, should take pause and consider what he is saying. The Constellation Program is about going to the Moon and onward to Mars and Beyond. ISS was added as an appeasement really, but it is not part of the Design Reference Mission and is not supposed to drive any design decisions on Orion or Ares I. So to say there is confusion is not true. Even if he supports accelerating Orion for access to ISS (and that is a huge if), that is NOT supporting Contellation or any of its true goals. That really amounts to a plan to turn the Orion into another LEO vehicle to appease those who are worried about having to buy access to space from the Russians. That again is ASSUMING he is even informed enough to know that ISS was never the goal of Contellation - another thing I seriously doubt. Also, the 2011 budget (which would be the second budget that an Obama Presidency would have control over) takes the Space Shuttle Program budget and gives it to Constellation, to ramp up the Altair and Ares V designs. By his plan, he would take ALL of the Constellation budget, except $500 million to use on his education policy. His words, not mine. That means he would be taking in the vacinity of $6 to $7 billion a year from Constellation, right when it was supposed to really have a decent budget for the first time. Of course, if he is even in the position to "be in his second term" I think at that point, it will be too late to wory about any Constellation at all, as he will have destroyed it by then. So please people, stop saying that Obama is confusing or unclear on space policy. Stop making excuses and apologies for Obama's position on manned space exploration. He has been very clear in endless statements, even to the Houston Chronicle, that he thinks manned space exploration is a waste of time and money. If he couldn't even do enough research on Constellation, exploration and the VSE before talking to the Houston Chronicle of all papers, then it is obvious that he does not care about space exploation or NASA and his policies would reflect that if elected. Maybe McCain and Clinton haven't given us detailed plans for their space policy, but both have been very supportive of manned exploration, both have Congressional records that reflect that, neither of them has said a negative thing about space, neither of them has repeateldy dumped on space exploration and neither of them has said they are going to decimate NASAs manned exploration budget to pay for one of their pet plans. What probably offends me the most about Obama and his views of space, is how he constantly makes disapraging remarks about it, but then will talk about Kennedy's dream that a man would walk on the moon. He says awful things about space to the Houston Chronicle, but then the very next day has the AUDACITY (his word) to open his rally speech in Houston with the words "Houston, we have lift off!" "... and thinks funding should be trimmed until the mission is clearer...." Is this somehow related to the old chestnut "The beatings will continue until morale improves!"? Though I have typically voted Republican over my lifetime, I will say that Obama is a great speaker. However, as eloquent as his words may sound at times, a closer examination of some of the things he has said reveals, in my opinion, a level of ignorance or perhaps a lack of thought about aerospace issues. This is a critical deficiency given the importance of the aerospace industry to American prosperity. Now, he may disagree with the Vision for Space Exploration, but it was the adoption of that thorough and sensible mission statement that *finally*gave* NASA a stated focus that it had been lacking for decades. So, his statement that NASA has lost focus seems oddly uninformed, to me. Also, space shuttle launches are no less remarkable now than they were years ago, but young people have grown up in a world where there was always a space shuttle. It's a given to them. Now that the space station is in the final stages of completion, we are moving forward to implement the Vision. Obama has suggested that until the NASA mission is clearer, funding should be trimmed. It doesn't have to be told to most people what the effects of that would be. If the mission isn't clear enough to Obama, he should do some reading, or ask his fellow Congressional representatives who are trying to get NASA funding increased to accomplish all that they have on their plate. Obama claims he intends to pursue educational initiatives, particularly in the area of science, and math. I know for a fact that there are plenty of young people out there who have been inspired to pursue math and science solely because of the space shuttle program, and other NASA activities. I have interviewed some of them over the past few years for a publication, and have worked with some of them as they have written about their motivations for pursuing math and science. So, Obama's lack of knowledge about space issues is troubling to me on a number of fronts. Obama's space policy is confusing. He has said in the past he wants to cut NASA funding but also close the CEV/shuttle gap. He states that the funding he wants would be from delaying the moon/mars stuff. But, if you look at the exploration budget numbers, I don't think any real moon/mars stuff (Ares V, altair) really starts until what would be his second term. I understand that space policy is a secondary issue. But, I do wish Obama would come out with a concise statement to clarify his comments. They are not clear to anyone familiar with NASA. Great job on the election coverage. It is good to see you trying to make this is an issue. Hopefully there will be a Florida revote. That could bring NASA front and center. March 7, 2008Mitt and Ann Hold Hands at Pad 39A
NASA caption: "Images taken of the Mitt Romney tour at KSC are not, in any way, intended to reflect the endorsement of any candidate by NASA. These images were taken during a tour that is typically provided to other VIP's. NASA has not authorized the use of these images for campaign purposes and has obtained a commitment from the Romney campaign NOT to use these images for campaign purposes. These images are being released in response to FOIA requests."
Kerry Blows Opportunity at KSC, 2004 post Comments? Send them to nasawatch@spaceref.com. Your comments thus far:
You don't need a bunny suit to get into the White Room, just to get into the orbiter itself. Mitt and Ann are OK as long as they don't "break the plane" of the hatch. At least, those were the rules when I toured the place during STS-123 TCDT. We needed bunny suits to get inside Discovery in OPF-3, but not to get into the White Room, as long as we did not actually go inside Endeavour. About your photo of Mr. Romney, you are INCORRECT about the requirement of wearing clean room garments at that location. The yellow hose you see on the left side of the photo is providing a positive purge inside the crew module that exits out the only opening (I/E Hatch). Only requirement for clean room garments is if you were going to gain access inside the crew module. So please do not think he was given special privileges.
I am not taking any political stands here at all, I merely wish to set the record strait. In the picture shown, the Romneys are doing nothing wrong (from a work area perspective at any rate). The white room at the pad is NOT a clean room environment. Engineers, technicians and astronauts routinely sit, stand and work in "street clothes" right exactly where the Romneys are. I have done so myself on numerous occasions. It is where we don the cleanroom garments to enter the orbiter. One walks across a tacky mat entering the whiteroom (which has a positive purge on it coming from the yellow duct entering the orbiter in the picture) and there tyically is one behind where the Romneys are sitting to control contamination. IF they actually entered the orbiter, cleanroom garments would be required. That has always been the SOP. The overalls one sees technicians wearing when the crew enters the orbiter for flight are flame retardant garments, not clean room garments. Sign me: A long time Shuttle veteran from KSC They're not that unusual. When I visited, the people working inside the orbiter were in "bunny suits", but so long as you stayed outside, it wasn't a requirement. This was a few years ago, but I don't think the rules have changed much. This wasn't a formal NASA tour, so no PAO cameras or minders, but we were informed what the rules were. March 3, 2008Election 2008 Update 3 March 2008
"In the countdown to Tuesday's Texas primary, the candidates still in the race are positioning themselves as astronauts' best friends -- but what they would actually do for manned space travel once elected remains up in the air. Under President Bush's current plan, the space shuttle will be retired in 2010. And with every candidate coming to Texas and professing devotion to NASA, space-watchers are trying to determine what the candidates actually will do when faced with a reeling economy and a record federal debt." Candidates' Views Differ on Space Exploration, NPR "Advocates of NASA's plan to return to the moon are concerned that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has said he will raid NASA's budget to fund education. While the issue of space exploration hasn't gotten much attention this campaign season, it is a topic on which the candidates do differ." March 2, 2008Clinton Pledges to Double NASA R&D Budget
"Hillary will double NASA's and FAA's aeronautics R&D budgets as part of her plan to reverse the Bush administration's war on science. She will pursue a balanced strategy of robust human spaceflight, expanded robotic spaceflight, and enhanced space and Earth science activities. She will speed development, testing, and deployment of next-generation launch and crew exploration vehicles to replace the aging Space Shuttle program." March 1, 2008Election 2008 Update 1 March 2008
"Many space constituents are publicly critical of the Obama campaign for campaign rhetoric that is less overtly supportive of the status quo of the US space program than that of the Clinton or McCain campaigns. However, to this constituent of space, Obama's ambivalence makes him THE MOST ATTRACTIVE Presidential candidate in this campaign. Why?" February 29, 2008Election 2008 Update 29 February 2008
Obama: "I've got a strong belief in NASA and the process of space exploration. I do think that our program has been stuck for a while - that the space shuttle mission did not inspire the imagination of the public - that much of the experimentation that was done could have been conducted not necessarily with manned flights. I think that broadening our horizons - and looking at a combination of both unmanned satellites of the sort that we saw with the Jupiter launch - but also looking at where we can start planning for potential manned flights. I think that is something that I'm excited about and could be part of a broader strategy for science and technology investment ... The only thing I want to say is that I want to do a thorough review because some of these programs may not be moving in the right direction and I want to make sure that NASA spending is a little more coherent than it has been over the last several years. February 28, 2008Election 2008 Update 28 February 2008
"Clinton pointed out that Hillary Clinton places more of an emphasis than Obama on human space travel. "This is the center of American space travel," he said of Houston and the Johnson Space Center. "Sixteen thousand (local) jobs -- and a lot of America's future -- rely on this." Bill Clinton Says Hillary Will Change Lives If Elected President, Fox 26 "He also emphasized her commitment to manned spaceflight. About 100,000 people in the Houston area work for NASA's Johnson Space Center or related industries." Bill: Hillary Hearts Outer Space, National Journal Hotline em>"Hillary has always supported the manned space program just as I did when I was president," he told a crowd of over 250 who gathered in a picturesque neighborhood park in a Houston suburb today. "Her opponent says we should downgrade man space travel and upgrade robotic travel." February 24, 2008Election 2008 Update 24 February 2008
"It wasn't in primetime. In fact, it wasn't broadcast at all. The audience wasn't hand-picked to equally represent the candidates. But a weekend debate at the American Association for the Advancement of Science between science advisors to the Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama campaigns was strikingly similar to forums between the candidates." Scientists urged to plan for the next US president, Nature (subscription) "Alec Ross, a technology entrepreneur and adviser to Obama, focused on his candidate's plans to expand broadband and technology infrastructure to all Americans. He also hinted that within weeks Obama would unveil a new plan for NASA and space exploration." Hillary Clinton campaigns in Houston, AP "Clinton took the stage at about 9:40 p.m. and spoke for about 30 minutes. She touched on usual campaign themes, including affordable health care for all Americans and bringing home the troops from Iraq. She also hit on a local note, pledging to keep funding NASA. "I believe we need to keep funding our next generation of spacecraft," she said." Clinton, Obama address Houston hot topics, Houston Chronicle "Obama agreed that NASA, which employs thousands of Houston-area voters who work at or with the Johnson Space Center, should be a tool for inspiring the nation. But, he said, the next president needs to have "a practical sense of what investments deliver the most scientific and technological spinoffs -- and not just assume that human space exploration, actually sending bodies into space, is always the best investment." February 17, 2008Election 2008 UpdateClinton, Obama address Houston hot topics, Houston Chronicle "I intend to pursue an ambitious agenda in both space exploration and earth sciences," Clinton said. "I want to support the next generation of spacecraft for a robust human spaceflight program." Obama agreed that NASA, which employs thousands of Houston-area voters who work at or with the Johnson Space Center, should be a tool for inspiring the nation. But, he said, the next president needs to have "a practical sense of what investments deliver the most scientific and technological spinoffs -- and not just assume that human space exploration, actually sending bodies into space, is always the best investment." February 12, 2008Former Astronaut Endorses ClintonJohn Glenn Endorses Clinton, AP "In 1962, Glenn, a Marine pilot, was the first American to orbit the Earth, becoming an instant national hero. In 1998, shortly before retiring from Senate after 24 years, he became the world's oldest astronaut, returning to space aboard the Shuttle Discovery at age 77. Glenn briefly sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 1984. "I am deeply honored to have the support of Senator Glenn, a true American hero," Clinton said. "With his help, we'll bring our message of change across Ohio." February 8, 2008Election 2008 Update
"Last night, Michael Laine and I went to see Hillary campaign along the Seattle waterfront in a cruise line terminal. I squeezed underneath some bleachers to get to the VIP area and wiggled my way right up next to the disabled people and seniors. Then, when she was in the middle of her speech, I shouted: "Send Astronauts to Mars!" using a Hillary sign as a megaphone. She faltered, and continued talking about technology and innovation." February 1, 2008Debate Questions: Worth the Effort?
But to me, the most important thing was a demonstration - by all of those people who submitted and voted for space-related questions - that space exploration advocates could exert this common surge of effort and help raise the issue of space exploration in a way that has not been seen in the past. Neither party has picked a nominee. And there is still a general election after they do. The opportunities to exert similar - and perhaps greater influence will continue. You did it once, you can do it again. What's The Point?, Political Action For Space "I'm proud of what has happened, and I feel encouraged that sustaining our efforts throughout this election and beyond will bear greater fruits. I pledge to you all that I will continue my efforts running actionforspace.com to make it easier for you to have an impact on the future of the space exploration. I look forward to the continued help and participation for you all. Thanks for your incredible response for the debates in Los Angeles." Comments? Send them to nasawatch@reston.com. Your comments so far: Keith, imagine what would have happened if one of the space questions, esp. one of the bolder ones, had made it into either debate: The discussion would most certainly have turned quickly to the cost and relative(!) benefits of - crewed - spaceflight vs. other more pressing needs. Does anyone really believe that any of the remaining candidates would have said something like "hey, I'll get the U.S. out of the Iraq mess quickly and then we can spend all the billions saved on a Mars colony"? The effort to convince politics that going to Mars ASAP or the VSE or ALT.VSE or some other crewed space activity is really worth it has to start at a much more fundamental level IMHO: You've got to convince the broad public first and start with its more space-friendly faction. Even there a lot of work lies ahead, as the debate on crewed vs. robotic or rather the best proportion of the two is far from settled even in the space advocacy groups. Regarding the rants against Politico and CNN here and elsewhere: I guess they very well understood that there was a massive campaign from space groups going on (after all even the 'real media' like Space News reported about it!) and thus decided that the huge amount of space votes did not reflect the priorities of their audience in general. Has anyone seen a poll on voters' priorities where the answers could be chosen freely and where space ended up near the top or in the list at all? Daniel Fischer (U.S. campaign news junkie & space afficionado from Germany) Keith, I can't see any comment from Politico on how they selected questions, and why none of the top space questions were asked. Is there any explanation from these people? How can they seriously entertain the idea of generating the question list by user votes, when they neither follow through or even comment on user input after the fact. At least they should say 'thanks for all your time, effort, and interest on our site, but we thought up some better questions at the last minute'. Also, what evidence is there that anyone, let alone the campaign organizations, are aware of the level of interest in space related questions. I never saw any statistics regarding how many votes there were for any of the questions, or any comments attempting to head off the notion that a few space geeks flooded the site early. I assume that there were many, many votes for space q's, and that the process was 'fair' (1 vote per IP address), but I don't see any comment by Politico attesting to this, so how do I know that the candidates haven't blown off the stories in Wired and elswhere that there was such a surge in interest? Have any of the candidates made any comments about the number of space question submissions and votes, or is this more space obscurity? For that matter, do you know if any of them read your web site? Am I actually on a different planet than they are? "Maybe the Republicans are right about the media." What, that the news media is biased and they have their own agendas? Of course they are and they do! It is impossible to report ANYTHING without the message getting infused with the messenger's attitudes and outlook, however fair and balanced they truly think themselves to be. Such is the nature of communication. What is so refreshing about folks like Keith Cowing, and so damnably irritating about the mainstream reporters and their supporting organizations, is that Keith almost always owns up to where he's coming from, while the others continue to insist with straight faces that they are unbiased and aloof and are merely presenting "the facts." Let us not forget what William Randolf Hearst (often considered one of the fathers of yellow journalism*) said more than a century ago regarding the Spanish-American War: "You provide the pictures and I'll provide the war." *a redundant term if I've ever heard one... As disappointed as I have been through the years with so many politicians and ineffective leaders in all disciplines (including spaceflight), I reserve my strongest contempt for the "news" media and what they've been pulling over on the American people for decades. The only problem, just like democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others, is that a free society needs a free press (biased as it inevitably is) to remain free. Luckily, the new media avenues (including this one) are exerting a detectable, positive influence on the mainstream ones, and that is a good thing. As for the debate questions: I concur that the effort was not a waste. Getting ANY exposure helps make in-roads into the American public's consciousness, which is the first necessary step to having them value space programs and in turn create a demand for more investment in space. And as Keith pointed out: it ain't over yet. Hi Keith, I too was rather taken aback given the fact that space policy questions were not asked during either of the presidential debates. I however would say that all of the time I fired off questions and voted however WAS worth it. At least all of the candidates know that space program supporters are out there and not just working for space or defense contractors. They also know that the direction the country takes our space program is important. Above all they ALL know that we vote, we're watching, we're vocal, and we're not going away. I will be writing all of the candidates using the links on actionforspace.com on how I feel on this issue. Thanks again for posting the link to ask debate questions on your site. Keith: Despite the fact that no space-related questions were asked, I think it is likely that the candidates' teams studied the list of highly ranked potential questions and prepared answers for them. These prepared answers would have had to be thought-out and vetted within the campaigns such that they would become policy positions. So, assuming the answers were pro-space, the effort was worthwhile. How do we start a campaign now against CNN and Politico.com. They deceived the people. 20 of the top 25 most popular questions on the Democrat side were about the Space Program and NASA, and they ignored us. Maybe Republicans are right about the media. I'm personally disgusted. Thanks for pointing us all in the direction of the site, even if they did ignore us. January 31, 2008Election 2008 Update
"Blogs such as Space Politics and NASA Watch, and organizations such as the Mars Society, keep a close eye on every utterance by a candidate on space policy. They instruct their audience how to contact the campaigns and even coach readers on how to get a space question inserted into a presidential debate. And they are being heard. "It's a small but vocal group, and they've reached out from the beginning," says the Obama staffer. "I'm impressed with the grassroots effort," adds Lori Garver, a Washington, D.C., space consultant and former NASA official who advises Obama's chief rival, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY). "They've done more than all the sophisticated lobbyists." January 29, 2008Coalition for Space Exploration Drops The Ball
"Dear Space Advocate, This week, the presidential candidates will be at the podium again discussing the significant topics of our nation, and YOU have a chance to ask about what's important. As a supporter of space, this is your opportunity to get questions about Space Exploration at the forefront of the debate. Please check out the following link: http://capwiz.com/spaceadvocate/utr/1/OSTZIARNGS/ATHLIARRAS/1699563546, and vote for your favorite question, or submit one of your own. Questions about candidates' views on Space Exploration have been in the top 10 for over a week. Let's keep these on the radar. Be sure to check out the "most popular" area in both the Democratic and Republican section to see the specific question and submit your vote. SpaceAdvocate.com is current undergoing maintenance at this time. However, you CAN make a difference by making your voice heard this week. Cast your vote or submit a question.... TODAY! Sincerely, SpaceAdvocate.com and the Coalition for Space Exploration" There is one small problem with this. If you go to SpaceAdvocate.com you will see that it is obviously no longer being operated by the Coalition for Space Exploration. Rather, a check of domain records shows that it is owned by some guy in Ankara, Turkey. I'm not certain how the Coalition folks could call this goof-up "maintenance" when they apparently have lost control of one of their prime websites. Election 2008 Update
"[John] Benac's call-to-arms read in part: "[W]e have a tremendous opportunity to put Mars on the political map for the presidential candidates. I have submitted a question for the Republican and Democratic debates that are happening in Los Angeles on January 30th. The way that this debate works is that people submit and vote for the questions that they like online, and the candidates are asked the ones with the most votes. Please tell everyone you think would act on this." Benac's plea to "put Mars on the political map" was quickly picked up and reposted by the Mars Society and the Web site NASAWatch.com, driving more traffic to the CNN/Politico.com Web site, resulting in the posting of new questions and votes for favorites." January 28, 2008NASA Watch on TV
O'Keefe Endorses McCainFormer NASA Chief Sean O'Keefe Endorses John McCain for President "John McCain has been my friend for over 25 years -- and over that span of time in the varied leadership roles I have held, I have witnessed John's passion for doing the right thing on behalf of and as a friend to all Americans. I am proud to support him for president," said Chancellor O'Keefe. "John McCain personifies the depth of character and integrity we need in our next president. His candor, service and sacrifice, and leadership experience in every crucial debate over the last 20 years will serve to inspire the next generation of leaders to serve causes greater than their own self interest." Stand and Be Counted: Only A Few Days Left!
The frequency of space questions has dropped off and space questions are starting to slip in rankings. I have no idea when they will shut this off. Waste no time: add new questions, go to "most popular" for each party and make sure you have voted for the topic questions. Get your friends and family members to vote. And, if you are so inclined, you might want to vote at work, at home, at Starbucks, from your cellphone ... tell your spouse and kids to vote ... we need to use the same tricks that other "interests" use i.e. vote early - and often - and do so strategically. You need to keep at this folks. Other "interests" have discovered this web page and are having an effect. This is a chance to make certain that the topic - and the veracity of its supporters - is known. These last few days are crucial. You have done a stellar job thus far - we can't let this opportunity slip as we head toward the home stretch. As of 12:29 AM EST we are # 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25 on the Democratic side - yet we are only #5, 8, 13, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23 on the Republican side. WE ONCE WERE #1 ON BOTH SIDES. THE TIME IS NOW Otherwise, just sit down and shut up. You had your chance. January 27, 2008McCain Space Policy Statement
"John McCain believes curiosity and a drive to explore have always been quintessential American traits. This has been most evident in the space program, for which he will continue his strong support." Sen. McCain's comments on S. 2541 NASA Reauthorization Act "Curiosity and a drive to explore have always been quintessential American traits. This has been most evident in the space program, which continues to show great advances in human knowledge. However, we are fully aware of the inherent risks and costs of space exploration, and the need to mitigate them wherever possible. Based on this knowledge, let us now embark upon this great journey into the stars to find whatever may await us." Election 2008 Update
"A month ago, I wouldn't have thought this the case, but (space exploration) is sort of in the candidates' face right now," said Keith Cowing, a former NASA astrobiologist who runs the Web site NASAwatch.com. "It seems as if something is happening (with space) and that hasn't been the case in years."Much of the political discussion centers on space exploration as a technology and education issue, Cowing said. "If you read some of the position papers carefully, then you see space and exploration as topics that are also linked to other aspects of technology development, balance of trade and education," Cowing said."
January 26, 2008Election 2008: Planetary Society Alert
"The U.S. Presidential primaries season is now in full swing, and debates among the candidates are taking place regularly before millions of viewers. It is a unique opportunity to push space topics onto the national political agenda. And you can help. Here's how: The sponsors of the debates are inviting the public to submit questions to the candidates online http://dyn.politico.com/debate/." Election 2008 Update
"He told them a Giuliani presidency will return America to the dominance it has lost in space. "The U.S. will be the first nation that puts somebody on Mars," he said. "We're not a limited people. We're not a people who think small," he told them. "We're here because we came from people who had grand visions." Republicans, Lost in Space, NY Times "Campaigning in his make-or-break state of Florida last week, Mr. Giuliani released a statement promising to "make space a priority." Apparently, America is facing a crisis far greater than health care or education reform: when the current fleet of space shuttles is retired in 2010, it's going to take as much as five years--five years, people!--before we can send another guy into orbit." January 24, 2008Election 2008 Update
"Tomorrow, January 24, all space supporters in Florida: at 6:45 p.m, Governor Romney attends a pre-debate rally at Bogart's Bar & Grille: Muvico Palace 20, 3200 Airport Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431 Go get yourself a burger, sidle up to good 'ole Mitt, and tell him why he needs to give NASA a couple billion more dollars. Tell him what effect if will have on your vote. He seems like a nice enough guy to talk to." January 23, 2008Election 2008 Update
"For the first time in decades, space policy is emerging as a presidential campaign issue and, political strategists say, could become a decisive factor in the race to the White House. In the run-up to Florida's Jan. 29 primary, candidates have begun to talk about their views on the future of human space exploration. On Friday, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani stopped at Kennedy Space Center to pledge he would give NASA the money it needs to return Americans to the moon and go to Mars. On Monday, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney followed suit." Time to put the Heat Onto Barack, Political Action For Space "Barack Obama is opening up a campign office in Huntsville in a few hours! Go there and tell him (or his campaign people) that his space policy needs to be revised!" January 20, 2008Stand and Be Counted: Space and Election 2008 - Update
"I am going to be hosting a Democratic presidential debate on Monday, January 21, in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina"
And don't forget about the 30/31 January Democratic/Republican debates. Go to this link at Politico.com to submit/vote on space questions. The frequency of space questions has dropped off and space questions are starting to slip in rankings. You need to keep at this folks.
January 19, 2008Election 2008 Update
"Mitt Romney won the Nevada primary this morning. He also accepted the same invitation the Giuliani had acted on yesterday to meet with the Economic Development Council of Florida’s Space Coast." Giuliani pledges to send astronauts to the moon and Mars, Political Action For Space "Giuliani stated boldly and unequivocally today his commintment to send humans to the Moon and Mars, among other things." Rudy at KSC today; Mitt coming Monday, Orlando Sentinel "Next up is Mitt Romney. The former Massachusetts governor plans to visit KSC on Monday for a closed tour and then meet with the Economic Development Commission of Florida’s Space Coast, which also lobbied Giuliani." January 18, 2008Stand and Be Counted - It Seems To Be Working
Space Supporters Hit the CNN Presidential Debate Website Hard, Wired "This is clearly not random chance. NASA Watch, a private website, ran a note about the website two days ago and it appears the readers (and likely the reader's friends, families, and associates) took this idea and ran with it."
Meanwhile there is another debate where CNN is looking for your input:
Space: The Final Electoral Frontier?, Orlando Sentinel "The surge followed an appeal from NASA Watch, a private website, encouraging space supporters to flood the debate website with questions about space. The request appears to have struck a nerve as NASA Watch aficionados and other space fans came out of the woodwork, inundating the website with inquires about the candidates' views on missions to the moon and mars, robotic exploration and climate change." Submit Your Space Questions to the Debates, Planetary Society "When you go to the site, you will see that numerous space-related questions already have been submitted, in large part thanks to the efforts of Keith Cowing, editor of the website NASAWATCH." Earlier posts: Wolf Blitzer: What would you ask the Democrats in South Carolina?, CNN Politics.com "I am going to be hosting a Democratic presidential debate on Monday, January 21, in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina"
January 15, 2008Americans, Science, Technology - And Space
"Science and Engineering Indicators, published by the National Science Board, provides a broad base of quantitative information on the U.S. and international science and engineering enterprise." page 7-13: "Relative to other topics, including S&T-related topics, interest in space exploration has consistently ranked low both in the United States and around the world. Surveys in Europe, Russia, China, and Japan document this general pattern." page 7-26/27: "Although support for federal research investment is at historically high levels, other kinds of federal spending generate even stronger public support (appendix table 7-18). Support for increased spending is greater in numerous program areas, including education (73%), health care (72%), assistance to the poor (68%), environmental protection (67%), and Social Security (61%). Scientific research ranks about on a par with mass transit (38%) and well ahead of Science and Engineering Indicators 2008 7-27 space exploration (14%) and assistance to foreign countries (10%) in the proportion of the U.S. population favoring increased spending." Another Chance to Get a Space Question To The CandidatesYour chance to ask the candidates a question, MSNBC "Watch the Jan. 15th 2008 Democratic Presidential Candidates' Debate — the first debate since the New Hampshire primaries — on MSNBC TV and MSNBC.com to see if your question is asked." January 11, 2008Obama On Space Exploration
"Over the decades, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has embodied the adventurous spirit that lifted this nation to greatness and inspired people around the world. Barack Obama believes that the United States needs a strong space program to help maintain its superiority not only in space, but also here on earth in the realms of education, technology, and national security. Over the years, NASA technology has been applied to improve everything from computers and medical technology to baby formula and automobiles. Work done at NASA, whether here on earth or in outer space, impacts the daily lives of all Americans." Election 2008, previous posts January 9, 2008Rudy's Visits To Florida's Space Coast
January 4, 2008Iowa Results and Space Exploration
Obama clarifies his space policy, Spacepolitics.com "Obama believes we should continue developing the next generation of space vehicles, and complete the international space station. While Obama would delay plans to return to moon and push on to mars, Obama would continue unmanned missions, and use NASA to monitor the forces and effects of climate change, support scientific research, and maintain surveillance to strengthen national security. Obama also believes we need to keep weapons out of space." Space Makes it into the Presidential Debate, earlier post "Cooper: Governor Huckabee? NASA pumps some -- let's see, how many -- $5 billion into Florida's economy. Huckabee: Whether we ought to go to Mars is not a decision that I would want to make, but I would certainly want to make sure that we expand the space program, because every one of us who are sitting here tonight have our lives dramatically improved because there was a space program -- whether it's these screens that we see or the incredible electronics that we use, including the GPS systems that got many of you to this arena tonight.(Laughter) Some of you were late because you didn't have one, by the way. Or whether it's the medical technologies that saved many of our lives or the lives or our families, it's the direct result of the space program, and we need to put more money into science and technology and exploration. Now, whether we need to send somebody to Mars, I don't know. But I'll tell you what: If we do, I've got a few suggestions, and maybe Hillary could be on the first rocket to Mars." Election 2008, Earlier posts Given Obama's initial and then restated policies on space exploration, and those expressed by Huckabee, what do their respective wins (and possible future wins) mean for space policy? Do they mean anything at all? Send your comments to nasawatch@reston.com Your comments thus far: "Obama would delay plans to return to moon and push on to mars" "Ares V is dead. No big surprise." Basic science is back. "None of the candidates have taken a positive stand for the VSE. Clinton has offered strong support for manned spaceflight in general, while Obama has stated his intention to raid NASA's budget to pay for some education programs. On the Republican side, there is no clarity of vision for manned spaceflight at all beyond some generic statements about being "for" it. What is at risk here is the very life of the VSE. We've been stuck in LEO for 30 years and this is probably our only real chance to get beyond it. Assuming it survives the election (which is by no means certain), it will probably be sharply curtailed by either party, for political or economic reasons, or maybe both. And then there's the politics. Almost nobody is going to want to keep "Bush's Space Plan." The trouble is that by the time the new President takes office, it will be too late to stop dismantling the Shuttle, and we will be forced to create something new. The question is: what will it be if it's not Bush's VSE?" "Given Obama's initial and then restated policies on space exploration, and those expressed by Huckabee, what do their respective wins (and possible future wins) mean for space policy? Do they mean anything at all?" Not to me. I hope that no one out there is picking the President of the United States based on their policies for space exploration! Even though I work in that field, there are far, far more important issues to deal with. We should be picking the President based on their plans to attack the real problems. In my mind, examples of those are long-term energy sources and the related economic and national security issues, universal health care and the question of how Medicare will be paid for in the future, nuclear proliferation, global warming, that sort of thing. For global warming, I would expect to see some attention paid to the use of space-based observational assets as part of the attack on that problem. But other than that, space exploration is not a factor in my consideration of candidates. - Anonymous According to CNN, coming out of Iowa Obama has 16 delegates, Clinton has 15 and Edwards has 14. At the convention one of the contenders will need 2605 delegates to get the nomination. It seems to me the Iowa result is that there will be a race, not that the race has already been won and lost. All this talk about space and the presidential election is bemusing, but let's face it—it's a waste of time. To project what will come from the next administration (Democrat or Republican), all one need do is look to their predecessors' actions (acknowledging, of course, that JFK's Apollo bid was an anomaly (See "Spaceflight and the Myth of Presidential Leadership" edited by Launius & McCurdy). What the candidates are saying during the campaigns has no bearing on what will actually come to pass. If a Democrat is elected, the manned space program will be descoped in terms of vision and slowed operationally to maintain the status quo while providing just enough funding to create the impression (especially for voters in Florida, Texas, and California) that the program is alive and well. While the shuttle will retire close to on time and work on the Earth-orbiting Orion will continue, plans for abandoning the ISS will be reconsidered...and Ares I may get shelved in lieu of EELV launch of a "Block I" Orion. We will not begin any new manned programs, and it's a good bet that the VSE lunar development would be scaled back to "advanced studies" with no real intention of cutting any metal for moving beyond Earth orbit (Ares V would likely be shelved, even as part of study work). Human Mars mission work will remain far over the horizon as we send a few (but scaled back) robotic missions. If a Republican is elected, the space program will stay on its current sluggish track toward deeper exploration (the VSE hardware design & development for lunar return would continue) and the new president may even propose a new grand and reasonably visionary initiative (an asteroid visit to emphasize the economic potential of solar system exploration?) near the end of his third year in office. Manned Mars mission work will remain a subject of study and even small-size hardware assessment, but only the robotic missions (as currently envisioned) will proceed to actual flight hardware and launch. UNFORTUNATELY, the entire program will continue to limp along on insufficient funding, killing Peter to pay Paul, because the budgets coming from the White House won't match their longer-term vision. Since the Republican OMB won't tolerate high up-front development costs, NASA will be forced to design the hardware (including Altair) with low-cost expediency (instead of long-term operations) as its primary "guiding" principle—so we (and future generations) will get saddled with another suite of equipment that severely limits our options for future exploration & applications. In either case, these same bemusing discussions will be taking place four years, eight years, and twelve years from now...and we (the U.S., at least) STILL won't be back on the Moon's surface, we won't have any options in place for deflecting an asteroid or comet, and humans on Mars will remain a dream as distant as the next century. January 3, 2008Botched PR From Mike and HuckSlippery PR ploys trip up practitioners, Opinion, USA Today "At first glance, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee and NASA chief Michael Griffin don't have much in common. Huckabee is no rocket scientist, and Griffin is no presidential aspirant. But their respective recent forays into the field of communications illustrate a common point: Sometimes it is easy to look dumb trying to be clever." December 13, 2007Senate Candidate Offers Little Shuttles To Donors
One of the things his campaign is offering in exchange for contributions are these little space shuttles. November 30, 2007AIA Urges Campaign Focus on Space ExplorationCampaigns Should Support Space Exploration, Aerospace Industries Association "Presidential campaigns should publicly express their support of NASA's Constellation Program to ensure America's leadership in space exploration as well as boost education, AIA President and CEO Marion Blakey said. The exploration program, which will return astronauts to the moon and explore Mars and beyond, should not be delayed under any circumstances since there is already a manned spaceflight gap looming." November 29, 2007Space Advocacy Groups: Not Ready For Prime Time?
November 28, 2007Today's Video: Space Makes It Into The Presidential Debate
"Steve Nielson: My name is Steve Nielson. And this question comes to you from Denver, Colorado. JFK's vision put a man on the moon from a nonexistent space program in about seven years. The new vision for space exploration has provided about 15 years for that same feat. Meanwhile, Congress is pulling funding for human-to-Mars research altogether. Is there a candidate amongst you willing to take a pledge on behalf of the Mars Society of sending an American to the surface of Mars by 2020? If not, what is your vision for human space exploration? Cooper: Governor Huckabee? NASA pumps some -- let's see, how many -- $5 billion into Florida's economy. Huckabee: Whether we ought to go to Mars is not a decision that I would want to make, but I would certainly want to make sure that we expand the space program, because every one of us who are sitting here tonight have our lives dramatically improved because there was a space program -- whether it's these screens that we see or the incredible electronics that we use, including the GPS systems that got many of you to this arena tonight. (Laughter) Some of you were late because you didn't have one, by the way. Or whether it's the medical technologies that saved many of our lives or the lives or our families, it's the direct result of the space program, and we need to put more money into science and technology and exploration. Now, whether we need to send somebody to Mars, I don't know. But I'll tell you what: If we do, I've got a few suggestions, and maybe Hillary could be on the first rocket to Mars. (Laughter) Cooper: Congressman Tancredo, 30 seconds, please. Tancredo: The question is a serious one and it deserves a serious answer, and that is this: Look, we've been -- how many times up here, how many questions have dealt with the issue of deficit spending, the debt out of control? And yet, we have somebody saying, "But would you spend more money on going to Mars?" And the suggestion that we need to spend more money on space exploration. This is it, folks. That's why we have such incredible problems with our debt, because everybody's trying to be everything to all people. We can't afford some things, and by the way, going to Mars is one of them." More on Obama's Proposed NASA CutsObama Trashing Space Exploration (discussion), Newsvine "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's education policy is causing a stir ... but not all in a good way. Advocates for space exploration are noting with dismay that he'd take billions of dollars from NASA to pay for the educational programs he'd like to expand." November 26, 2007Thoughts on Obama's Proposed NASA CutsSpace Vs. Education, MSNBC "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s education policy is causing a stir … but not all in a good way. Advocates for space exploration are noting with dismay that he’d take billions of dollars from NASA to pay for the educational programs he'd like to expand." November 23, 2007More on Clinton's Space PolicyFuture Human Spaceflight - Democratic Candidate Launches a Position as Opponents Orbit From a Safe Distance, Washington Post "The major presidential candidates pummel each other daily on issues ranging from the Iraq war to health care. But when it comes to President Bush's ambitious initiative to send humans back to the moon and on to Mars, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) is all but alone in staking out a formal position -- and it's one that lends support to key aspects of the president's effort. She initially outlined the need for a "robust" human spaceflight program last month during a Washington speech on science policy, despite being broadly critical of the Bush administration's record on scientific issues." November 20, 2007Obama Wants to Slash NASA's BudgetObama plan: reward teachers, lengthen school time, Baltimore Sun "Barack Obama is planning to unveil an education plan today that would make affordable pre-school programs more widely available and offer pay incentive programs for effective teachers. It would also allow schools to lengthen the teaching day or the school year. The $18 billion annual program would be offset by savings and cuts in federal agencies, including NASA. ... The cost of the early education plan would come partly from delaying the NASA Constellation Program for five years ..." Obama's Education Rollout, MSNBC "Though Obama called for a renewed investment in math and science education, his plan would actually pull money from the federal government's greatest investments and achievements in math and science. Obama would delay funding for the NASA Constellation program for five years, though he would maintain the $500 million in funding the program would receive for its manufacturing and technology base, in order to help fund his education policy. The campaign did not say how much money delaying the program would provide." Obama unveils education proposal , The Hill "A spokesman for the Republican National Committee (RNC) criticized the NASA cut. "It is ironic that Barack Obama's plan to help our children reach for the stars is financed in part by slashing a program that helps us learn about those very same stars," said Danny Diaz, RNC spokesman."
November 14, 2007A Preview of the Ron Paul AdministrationRon Paul: Trouble back home, The Hill "When told that "Ron Paul consistently opposes taxpayer funding for NASA and wants to eliminate the agency," 61 percent of Republican primary voters said this information would make them less likely to vote for Paul's reelection." October 15, 2007Rudy Courts ET VotersGiuliani: Preparedness key, even if aliens attack, AP "Presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani on Sunday said preparedness will be key for all crises, even an attack from outer space. During a town hall meeting in Exeter, a young questioner asked the former New York mayor about his plan to protect Earth. "If (there's) something living on another planet and it's bad and it comes over here, what would you do?" the boy asked." October 4, 2007Space Policy Enters 2008 CampaignHillary Clinton's Agenda to Reclaim Scientific Innovation "Hillary will enhance American leadership in space, including: - Pursuing an ambitious 21st century Space Exploration Program, by implementing a balanced strategy of robust human spaceflight, expanded robotic spaceflight, and enhanced space science activities. - Developing a comprehensive space-based Earth Sciences agenda, including full funding for NASA's Earth Sciences program and a space-based Climate Change Initiative that will help us secure the scientific knowledge we need to combat global warming. -Promoting American leadership in aeronautics by reversing funding cuts to NASA's and FAA's aeronautics R&D budget." "Fifty years ago, Sputnik marked the dawn of the Space Age and the beginning of a new era filled with new challenges. Fifty years later, there is no single, galvanizing event to steel our resolve and to lift our eyes to the heavens. The challenges we face are more complex and interconnected. From the rise of globalization to the threat of global warming. These challenges require big ideas and bold thinking."
Watch the speech on YouTube October 3, 2007Space Policy Is About To Enter 2008 CampaignScience Policy Speech by Hillary Clinton "Tomorrow morning, Hillary will be giving a speech on her science policy, and we'd like you to attend. After six years of George Bush putting ideology ahead of science, America is ready for a change, and Hillary will lay out her plans to support scientific research and restore the role of science in decision-making. Space is limited and RSVPs are required. RSVP now:"
July 23, 2007Where Do We Go From Here?NASA and the next administration, SpaceReview "It has long been a complaint of space advocates that presidential candidates spend little or no time discussing their space policy positions—if, in fact, they have bothered to develop any positions on the subject. Space is near the bottom of the list of topics of interest to the electorate in general, and one that is not a swing issue for all but a small handful of voters. It is also rarely a partisan issue, making it difficult for space policy to become more ammunition in the continuous battles between Republicans and Democrats. Thus, even in the current campaign—which is shaping up to be the longest and perhaps the most contentious in US history—there’s scant attention paid to space." June 12, 2007Political Objections to Ares 1 Are Apparently On The Rise
June 6, 2007Hillary Hears About Space
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's Presidential campaign held an "Issues Forum & Breakfast" this morning in Washington, DC. at the Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill - and space policy was on the agenda. Among the breakout sessions was one titled "Commercial & Civil Aerospace" which was led and hosted by former NASA Policy and Plans Associate Administrator Lori Garver. Former NASA Public Affairs Associate Administrator Glenn Mahone also participated as a moderator." May 23, 2007A Faster-Better-Cheaper Scolding From John McCain
"One bureaucrat who felt McCain's wrath was former NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin, who was summoned by McCain in 1999, not long after a $125-million probe crashed on Mars because of confusion over the use of English and metric units. McCain's Senate Commerce Committee had oversight over NASA. "McCain went ballistic the moment Goldin walked into McCain's office," said a participant in the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity because he still worked in the government arena. "He was shouting and using profanity, saying he was sick of NASA's screw-ups. It went on for a few minutes, and then he kicked Goldin out of the office." Goldin started walking down the hallway but was called back to the senator's office by a McCain aide. "When he came back in, McCain started yelling at Goldin all over again. And then McCain kicked Goldin out a second time before he ever said a word," the source said." May 10, 2007Will Rudy Talk About Space? Answer: NoGiuliani to visit Space Center, raise cash, Huntsville Times "Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani will visit Huntsville today for a luncheon fundraiser and a stop at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center. The Republican candidate for president is also making campaign stops in Tuscaloosa and Birmingham. Giuliani is to attend a $1,000-a-plate luncheon and photo op fundraiser at The Ledges in south Huntsville. It is a closed event, said Elliott Bundy, regional communications director for Giuliani's campaign." Giuliani stresses strong military, women's right of choice, Huntsville Times "Arriving afterward at the Space Center, Giuliani said military research in robotics and bomb detection not only would help in Iraq, but would improve law enforcement here and homeland security." March 28, 2007Space Policy Wonks Already Looking at 2008
February 20, 2007McCain on Space ExplorationMcCain meets religious broadcasters in Fla., holds town meetings, KVOA "[Republican presidential candidate John McCain] also said he strongly supports missions to Mars and that Florida should continue to play a major role in space exploration. "There's too much invested there. There's infrastructure that's very expensive and very extensive there," he said." |
Advertisements
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COPYRIGHT: Unless otherwise specified, all formatting, imagery, link collections, and HTML coding contained within this website © copyright 1996 - 2009. All Rights Reserved Re-use of graphics, text, or HTML formatting for commercial or private use is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
This website does not have any connection whatsoever with, endorsement by, or authorization from, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration nor does any product or service being offered or made available to the public have the authorization, support, sponsorship, or endorsement of, or the development, use, or manufacture by or on behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||