NASA Watch


NASA Watch note: This ANSER report is funded by a contract from NASA Headquarters, Code U and was obtained from someone@nasa.gov with no distribution restrictions or copyright caveats attached.
ANSER
Center for International Aerospace Cooperation
____________
Moscow Office Report #302

A Weekly Look at Aerospace Activities in Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan

20 November 1998

Prepared by:
George Rykov
Ivan Moiseyev
Susan Kizer


This Week's Topics:
Future Joint Missions to Mir Proposed

ANSER
ANSER, founded in 1958, is a not-for-profit public-service research institute that coordinates and conducts research for U.S. and international industry and government organizations. ANSER created the Center for International Aerospace Cooperation to foster worldwide cooperation on international aerospace projects and to advance the development and operations of international aviation and space systems.

President and CEO: Ruth David

________________________________

ANSER Center for International Aerospace Cooperation

The Center for International Aerospace Cooperation provides partnering, consulting, and research services to both private and government organizations in the fields of aerospace and related science and technology. The Center maintains a fully accredited Representative Office in Moscow. Established in 1992, the Representative Office is staffed by Russian and U.S. nationals.

The Center has worked in close cooperation with many leading aerospace institutes and enterprises in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, and has forged ties between our clients worldwide and their colleagues from the former Soviet Union. In keeping with our mission to serve as a catalyst to advance the development and operation of international aerospace systems and related science and technology, our activities have included establishing teaming arrangements, facilitating and monitoring research contracts, serving as technical liaison for on-site testing, and providing assessments of potential partners and market analyses.

U.S. and Russian experts at our Arlington, Virginia, headquarters and our Moscow Office conduct research for many government and industry clients on all aspects of international aerospace programs. In addition to its specialty in activities of the former Soviet Union and the United States, the Center provides expertise in activities involving China, Brazil, and India.

Director: Dick Kline
Program Manager: Henry W. Sterbenz
Director, Moscow Office: Susan Kizer

For additional information or assistance, please contact us at:

ARLINGTON OFFICE
1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 800
Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA
Voice: (703) 416-3164; Fax: (703) 416-8440
E-mail: sterbenh@anser.org

MOSCOW OFFICE
16/2 Tverskaya Ulitsa, Building #3, #12
103009 Moscow, Russia
Voice: +7-095-935-7057; Fax: +7-095-935-7056
E-mail: anser@co.ru
Homepage: http://anser.org/ciac


ANSER Center for International Aerospace Cooperation

Moscow Office Report #302

20 November 1998

 

Future Joint Missions to Mir Proposed

Recently, ANSER's Moscow Office met with Aleksandr A. Serebrov to discuss his views of the future of Russian aerospace activities and his ideas for further international cooperation in space. Mr. Serebrov, a retired Cosmonaut and veteran of 4 space missions and over a year in flight time, currently serves as Advisor on space issues to President Yeltsin's Administration, as well as President of the Russian Aerospace Society "Soyuz," which just celebrated its 10th anniversary.

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Serebrov

Engineer. Birth Date: 15 February 1944. Number of Flights: 4. Total Time: 372.95 days. Number of EVAs: 10. Total EVA Time: 31.63 hours.

Source: Encyclopedia Astronautica

Flights:

Launch Date

Flight Time, days

EVA

Soyuz T-7

8/19/82

7.91

-

Soyuz T-8

4/20/83

2.01

-

Soyuz TM-8

9/5/89

166.29

5

Soyuz TM-17

7/1/93

196.74

5

During ANSER’s meeting, Mr. Serebrov offered his ideas for near-term cooperation in space. Stressing that he was speaking from a purely personal standpoint, Serebrov outlined his concept for a joint project to reap scientific benefit from the Mir Space Station by cannibalizing it prior to its deorbit, a concept which would keep Mir in orbit ideally for another two years, but which could conceivably be completed before then.

[Editor’s Note: While Mir is scheduled to be deorbited in June 1999, there is a continuing political debate in Russia to keep Mir in orbit. A symbol of national pride, Mir has been continuously occupied now for over 9 years (following a brief interruption in 1989). NASA and other ISS partners continue to pressure Russia to keep to the June 1999 deorbit schedule in order to free resources for fulfilling Russia’s obligations for the International Space Station (ISS).]

Separating himself from the political debate of keeping Mir in orbit for reasons of national pride and prestige, Mr. Serebrov focused on potential scientific benefits that could be reaped from keeping Mir in orbit. He outlined three main scientific objectives to support keeping Mir in orbit, to benefit all ISS program participants and astronauts, as well as future space stations:

  • Ensuring ISS safety and reliability for future habitation. Mir was under construction for ten years. ISS will be under construction for no less time, during which time both material and equipment will be exposed to the harsh space environment that Mir has experienced. To ensure the safety and continued performance of ISS elements, it would be highly valuable to study the effect on Mir of 15 years of space exposure, which can be accomplished by cannibalizing Mir. Serebrov visualized a 15-year-old boy or girl in Moscow (or any one of the world's cities) who dreams of becoming an astronaut. In ten years he or she might be on the way to ISS. Their safety depends on the safety of ISS, and what we may learn from studying Mir.

[Editor's Note: While Serebrov did not specifically mention it, foreseeably there is also the possibility that such a project could be completed before Mir reaches its 15th birthday, either prior to or soon after its already scheduled deorbiting in June 1999. Presumably data obtained from such a mission to a 13-year-old station would be just as valuable, though likely to have more impact on missions beyond ISS, since most data obtained from Mir would be obtained too late to affect ISS design and construction.]

  • Preserving valuable equipment. There is a great deal of valuable and still operable equipment on Mir, designed and manufactured by scientists from around the world, much of which will be operable for many more years. In addition, an entire Mir module, Priroda (3 years old), could be preserved and incorporated into ISS.
  • Continuation of space-based research. During the gap between Mir's planned deorbit and the time that the International Space Station (ISS) is ready to house experiments, the world community would be deprived of continued space-based scientific research.

Ideas such as Serebrov’s were likely the impetus for the Russian Space Agency’s request (and subsequent withdrawal in early November 1998) to change the ISS orbit, prior to the Zarya launch on 20 November 1998, to align it more closely with Mir’s.

What is required? Serebrov suggests prolonging the operation of Mir for two more years. Then, after the first two ISS elements are put into operation, the Space Shuttle can fly two missions within the existing shuttle launch schedule of missions to ISS for the following two missions. (See the table below for a combined schedule of current Mir events and Space Shuttle ISS assembly missions.) The Shuttle would be required in order to transport the large amount of samples and equipment to ISS and/or back to earth.

1. Dismantle operable scientific equipment from Mir and deliver it to ISS. An existing crew aboard Mir will have been working to disassemble and package equipment for transport. Such a scheme, Mr. Serebrov described, was used successfully for the first time when transferring equipment from the Salyut-7 to the Mir station.

2. Dismantle critical Mir elements (both interior and exterior) for further laboratory investigation on earth. To accomplish this, the crew would be evacuated, and an American astronaut and Russian cosmonaut team would dismantle critical parts, perhaps as much as two tons’ worth (based on Shuttle capacity), to include shielding elements, heat tubes, etc. After the completion of work, Mir could be given the necessary commands to begin its descent and deorbit.

Expected Costs. Currently, Mir operational costs amount to US$250 million annually which include costs related to four flights of Progress cargo vehicles (about US$35 million each), two Soyuz missions (US$40 million each) and ground support (about US$30 million). For the extended Mir program, Mr. Serebrov proposes to use three Progress cargo vehicles and two Soyuz vehicles with two crew members aboard. Thus, the operational costs associated with the program extension would be about US$215 million. Private funds and donations, he proposes, could cover half that costs. The second half could be covered by Russia, Japan, Europe, and the U.S., and all participants in the ISS program who care about the safety of their future crews.

Mr. Serebrov is of the opinion that with the existing ISS assembly sequence (see the Table below) it is possible to use two already planned STS missions to cannibalize the Mir station.

Combined Schedule of ISS-assembly and Mir-related Launches

(Russian Mir missions, thru its planned June 1999 deorbit, in shaded areas). According to Serebrov’s plan, two space shuttle missions, within the existing space shuttle mission schedule, would be required to fulfill his concept.

Date

Flight

Launch Vehicle

Main Cargo

Nov 20, 1998

1A/R

Proton

FGB (launched 20 Nov 98, on schedule)

Dec 3, 1998

2A

STS-88

Unity Node

Feb 22, 1999

   

Soyuz TM-29 (Mir-27)

Mar 2, 1999

   

Soyuz TM-28 (Mir-26) Return

Mar 10, 1999

   

Progress M-41 (Mir resupply)

Apr 2, 1999

   

Progress M-50

May 1999

2A.1

STS-96

Spacehab Double Cargo Module

Jun 1, 1999

   

Soyuz TM-29 (Mir-27) Return

Jun 8, 1999

   

Mir Deorbit

July 1999

1R

Proton

Service Module

Aug 1999

2A.2

STS-101

Spacehab Double Cargo Module

Oct 1999

3A

STS-92

Integrated Truss Structure, Control Moment Gyros

Dec 1999

4A

STS-97

Integrated Truss Structure, Photovoltaic Module, Radiators

Jan 2000

2R

Soyuz

Expedition 1 Crew

Feb 2000

5A

STS-98

Laboratory Module

Mar 2000

5A.1

STS-102

Logistics and Resupply, Multi-Purpose Logistics Module

Apr 2000

6A

STS-100

Leonardo MPLM (U.S. Lab outfitting), Space Station Remote Manipulating System (SSRMS)

Jul 2000

7A

STS-104

Joint Airlock, High Pressure Gas Assembly

_________________________


Return to NASA Watch