|
NASA Watch note: This ANSER report is funded by a contract from NASA Headquarters, Code U and was obtained from someone@nasa.gov with no distribution restrictions or copyright caveats attached. Center for International Aerospace Cooperation ____________ Moscow Office Report #302 A Weekly Look at Aerospace Activities in Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan 20 November 1998
Prepared by:
This Week's Topics: Future Joint Missions to Mir Proposed
The Center has worked in close cooperation with many leading aerospace institutes and enterprises in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, and has forged ties between our clients worldwide and their colleagues from the former Soviet Union. In keeping with our mission to serve as a catalyst to advance the development and operation of international aerospace systems and related science and technology, our activities have included establishing teaming arrangements, facilitating and monitoring research contracts, serving as technical liaison for on-site testing, and providing assessments of potential partners and market analyses. U.S. and Russian experts at our Arlington, Virginia, headquarters and our Moscow Office conduct research for many government and industry clients on all aspects of international aerospace programs. In addition to its specialty in activities of the former Soviet Union and the United States, the Center provides expertise in activities involving China, Brazil, and India. Program Manager: Henry W. Sterbenz Director, Moscow Office: Susan Kizer For additional information or assistance, please contact us at:
ARLINGTON OFFICE
MOSCOW OFFICE ANSER Center for International Aerospace Cooperation Moscow Office Report #302 20 November 1998
Future Joint Missions to Mir Proposed Recently, ANSER's Moscow Office met with Aleksandr A. Serebrov to discuss his views of the future of Russian aerospace activities and his ideas for further international cooperation in space. Mr. Serebrov, a retired Cosmonaut and veteran of 4 space missions and over a year in flight time, currently serves as Advisor on space issues to President Yeltsin's Administration, as well as President of the Russian Aerospace Society "Soyuz," which just celebrated its 10th anniversary.
During ANSERs meeting, Mr. Serebrov offered his ideas for near-term cooperation in space. Stressing that he was speaking from a purely personal standpoint, Serebrov outlined his concept for a joint project to reap scientific benefit from the Mir Space Station by cannibalizing it prior to its deorbit, a concept which would keep Mir in orbit ideally for another two years, but which could conceivably be completed before then. [Editors Note: While Mir is scheduled to be deorbited in June 1999, there is a continuing political debate in Russia to keep Mir in orbit. A symbol of national pride, Mir has been continuously occupied now for over 9 years (following a brief interruption in 1989). NASA and other ISS partners continue to pressure Russia to keep to the June 1999 deorbit schedule in order to free resources for fulfilling Russias obligations for the International Space Station (ISS).] Separating himself from the political debate of keeping Mir in orbit for reasons of national pride and prestige, Mr. Serebrov focused on potential scientific benefits that could be reaped from keeping Mir in orbit. He outlined three main scientific objectives to support keeping Mir in orbit, to benefit all ISS program participants and astronauts, as well as future space stations:
[Editor's Note: While Serebrov did not specifically mention it, foreseeably there is also the possibility that such a project could be completed before Mir reaches its 15th birthday, either prior to or soon after its already scheduled deorbiting in June 1999. Presumably data obtained from such a mission to a 13-year-old station would be just as valuable, though likely to have more impact on missions beyond ISS, since most data obtained from Mir would be obtained too late to affect ISS design and construction.]
Ideas such as Serebrovs were likely the impetus for the Russian Space Agencys request (and subsequent withdrawal in early November 1998) to change the ISS orbit, prior to the Zarya launch on 20 November 1998, to align it more closely with Mirs. What is required? Serebrov suggests prolonging the operation of Mir for two more years. Then, after the first two ISS elements are put into operation, the Space Shuttle can fly two missions within the existing shuttle launch schedule of missions to ISS for the following two missions. (See the table below for a combined schedule of current Mir events and Space Shuttle ISS assembly missions.) The Shuttle would be required in order to transport the large amount of samples and equipment to ISS and/or back to earth. 1. Dismantle operable scientific equipment from Mir and deliver it to ISS. An existing crew aboard Mir will have been working to disassemble and package equipment for transport. Such a scheme, Mr. Serebrov described, was used successfully for the first time when transferring equipment from the Salyut-7 to the Mir station. 2. Dismantle critical Mir elements (both interior and exterior) for further laboratory investigation on earth. To accomplish this, the crew would be evacuated, and an American astronaut and Russian cosmonaut team would dismantle critical parts, perhaps as much as two tons worth (based on Shuttle capacity), to include shielding elements, heat tubes, etc. After the completion of work, Mir could be given the necessary commands to begin its descent and deorbit. Expected Costs. Currently, Mir operational costs amount to US$250 million annually which include costs related to four flights of Progress cargo vehicles (about US$35 million each), two Soyuz missions (US$40 million each) and ground support (about US$30 million). For the extended Mir program, Mr. Serebrov proposes to use three Progress cargo vehicles and two Soyuz vehicles with two crew members aboard. Thus, the operational costs associated with the program extension would be about US$215 million. Private funds and donations, he proposes, could cover half that costs. The second half could be covered by Russia, Japan, Europe, and the U.S., and all participants in the ISS program who care about the safety of their future crews. Mr. Serebrov is of the opinion that with the existing ISS assembly sequence (see the Table below) it is possible to use two already planned STS missions to cannibalize the Mir station. Combined Schedule of ISS-assembly and Mir-related Launches (Russian Mir missions, thru its planned June 1999 deorbit, in shaded areas). According to Serebrovs plan, two space shuttle missions, within the existing space shuttle mission schedule, would be required to fulfill his concept.
_________________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||